Why A Macerator Toilet Versus Regular
With what I've been reading there are more cons than pros for macerator toilets, so I'm confused why so many newer coaches with bath and half have one of each?
Basically the cons from googling many "pros and cons of" have generally come up saying: Uses more water typically; pumps fail often; more to go wrong; blockages more common place. Typically all of them had about 4 pros to 3 times that of cons???
I'd value your candid thoughts, as on some FT Rver websites/blogs/channels, those that have changed out a regular toilet to them have said "uses less water" hence better for boondocking, needs emptying less often. Yet generalized searching kind of contradicts this.
Looking forwards to your thoughts/experiences having used both over time hopefully.
Basically the cons from googling many "pros and cons of" have generally come up saying: Uses more water typically; pumps fail often; more to go wrong; blockages more common place. Typically all of them had about 4 pros to 3 times that of cons???
I'd value your candid thoughts, as on some FT Rver websites/blogs/channels, those that have changed out a regular toilet to them have said "uses less water" hence better for boondocking, needs emptying less often. Yet generalized searching kind of contradicts this.
Looking forwards to your thoughts/experiences having used both over time hopefully.
