Supereri73 wrote:
Jeez, tough crowd. The confusion was already cleared up before the condescending post. I said "Uh hmmm. Not as funny as I thought. There is an actual anti-condensation feature that uses a heater.... ". But, some just refuse to read the words right in front of them. :S
Oh I read your retraction alright ... but the point is none of this would have come up if you'd just taken the time to read the prior discussion in it's entirety, including links that provided all the information needed to clearly understand what was being discussed,
before hitting the keyboard in response. Seems to be a common ailment here on the forums. :S