GSRA

vicmic1983 wrote:

darsben wrote:

vicmic1983 wrote:

darsben wrote:
They have served me well but it is your money and your agenda (whatever that is)

My "agenda" is to (if needed) receive the service I paid for rather than fight for it. And that to me is a viable option.

None of them will suit you then cause they all fail. The only difference is that here you can see GoodSam failures the other sites do not allow the discourse available here. The problems are hidden by coachnet etc.

Good point...

I did some research on Coach Net and AAA, as you eluded to the grass is not greener on the other side of the fence.

darsben wrote:

vicmic1983 wrote:

darsben wrote:
They have served me well but it is your money and your agenda (whatever that is)

My "agenda" is to (if needed) receive the service I paid for rather than fight for it. And that to me is a viable option.

None of them will suit you then cause they all fail. The only difference is that here you can see GoodSam failures the other sites do not allow the discourse available here. The problems are hidden by coachnet etc.

Good point...

It's kind of like playing the lottery.

vicmic1983 wrote:

darsben wrote:
They have served me well but it is your money and your agenda (whatever that is)

My "agenda" is to (if needed) receive the service I paid for rather than fight for it. And that to me is a viable option.

None of them will suit you then cause they all fail. The only difference is that here you can see GoodSam failures the other sites do not allow the discourse available here. The problems are hidden by coachnet etc.

darsben wrote:
They have served me well but it is your money and your agenda (whatever that is)

My "agenda" is to (if needed) receive the service I paid for rather than fight for it. And that to me is a viable option.

Thank you for your input... Looking at the numerous replies, it appears that there is no single standard for service. Some members have received service for one incident and another does not. Money is important to us but I would rather pay more for a service that is guaranteed rather than (as appears to be the case) service that servicing agents "want or do not want" to give. The service that is being paid for and what some of our member are receiving is at best ambiguous. I do not want to be in a situation where this service is needed and the only service I receive is "Sorry about your Luck".

They have served me well but it is your money and your agenda (whatever that is)

At the rate of $79.95, you will not be getting much service, no matter which vendor you go through. Be sure to compare apples to apples...look closely at their limits....