Forum Discussion

rv2go's avatar
rv2go
Explorer II
Jan 08, 2014

Jack Digital HDTV Antenna Replacement Head

I want to replace my Winegard batwing antenna with the Jack Digital HDTV Antenna Replacement Head.
The Jack states, "Power it by your existing antenna power supply or use the included power injector that just plugs into an AC outlet"

Do I just connect the cable going to the batwing to the new Jack and the current batwing booster will work? I would rather not do any more wiring.

Any opinions on the performance of the Jack replacement head?

Thanks, Jim
  • Guess I have to disagree with the batwing outperforming the Jack.

    IF the batwing has the add on then yes, the gain is a bit more but is much more directional. The Jack was designed with the UHF frequencies used by most of the current television stations due to the Digital change which also included a frequency change.

    I have installed several Jack antenna's and they perform extremely well.

    Well worth the money and changing the head is a breeze. Needle nose pliars to remove a couple of C clips, some tape to re-secure the coax and you are done.
  • SCVJeff wrote:
    I don't recommend the Jack over the Batwing simply because the Batwing is a better performing antenna. IMO, physical interfearence is about the only good reason, and you gots a good one..

    Bummer...

    To answer the 1st question, yes. All you need to do is plug in the coax. The only difference is that the Jack lines up with the arrow on the Winegard pointer vs. Being 90 degrees off on the Batwing.


    I agree you have a valid reason to switch. Also, the last sentence about the Jack Antenna ends up pointing the direction of the large arrow inside (storage direction) is the likely reason some people think it works better.

    Many people do not have the foggiest idea which way they are actually aiming when turning it inside the RV. I sometimes get confused and have to step outside to see where I have the durn thing aimed. :B
  • I don't recommend the Jack over the Batwing simply because the Batwing is a better performing antenna. IMO, physical interfearence is about the only good reason, and you gots a good one..

    Bummer...

    To answer the 1st question, yes. All you need to do is plug in the coax. The only difference is that the Jack lines up with the arrow on the Winegard pointer vs. Being 90 degrees off on the Batwing.
  • Yep just hook it up to the coax and use your built in box.

    Fast and easy.I had the same problem with clearance so the add on would not work.

    Some have found it lacking and there are links to studies that seem to back it up but I found that it more than doubled the channels that I received compared to my working Bat Wing.
  • ericosmith wrote:
    That's what I did, about a 60 second installation. Works fine.


    Takes longer to climb up the ladder with your tools than it does to switch out the antenna heads. My reception improved after I installed the Jack. Your results may be different.
  • Bill.Satellite wrote:
    Do some searches before you change. The Jack will not increase your OTA TV reception and in some cases may reduce the signal available. This is the perfect forum for this question as the 2 antennas have been tested and one has been found lacking.

    Thanks Bill. The primary reason I want to change is that the Batwing gets in the way of my MotoSat Internet dish. Like now, The batwing will not rotate without hitting the LNB head. No TV. Wife is not happy.:M I guess I will have to reposition the MH so the batwing will rotate.
  • Do some searches before you change. The Jack will not increase your OTA TV reception and in some cases may reduce the signal available. This is the perfect forum for this question as the 2 antennas have been tested and one has been found lacking.