taddyport
Jun 15, 2014Explorer
winegard wingman
I currently have the sensar 111 antenna and am considering getting the wingman accessory for it. Can any of you give me any feedback on good/bad, great idea, or don't waste your money?
thanks
thanks
j-d wrote:
In these discussions, where the terms "VHF" and "UHF" come up, if the transmission has converted to DTV/HDTV, only the Channel Numbers are left. The Channels themselves are GONE, repurposed by FCC to other uses. Even the low numbers are actually on higher frequencies, and that's what the Wingman helps with. Say you liked "Channels 4 and 40." The 4 that displays on screen might now be on a higher frequency than 40. The tuner computer figures that out and shows you something you're familiar with. The bottom line? Something tuned for the new band, like Winegard WITH Wingman, a new Winegard model, or a Jack, will ALL help with EVERY broadcast TV channel.
bobsallyh wrote:
About another five minutes removing the Wingman that I put on yesterday and mounting the Jack which is a direct replacement for the Wineguard head which was about another five minutes. We went from 10 stations to 18. The trailer never moved so we are comparing apples to apples. Just my experience.
CA Traveler wrote:They don't claim its better than the Batwing, but its a direct replacement for it on the mast. My guess is that it will come in #3 performance wise behind the Jack, but easier to point than the other two. I'll get one and play over the summer.
Everyone: Winegard has a new flatwave outdoor antenna that they claim is better. My take is that it could be adapted to the standard crankup batwing mount.
There was a post that they are working on a crankup version.