Forum Discussion
RobertRyan
Nov 15, 2015Explorer
FishOnOne wrote:RobertRyan wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:FishOnOne wrote:ChooChooMan74 wrote:
Hope I don't regret buying the EcoD. But then again, I am not towing anything big.
I bet Dodge/RAM is asking themselves the same question.
I bet we aren't, we have a lock on the 6.7 as the only manufacture that can use that engine up to the 650/6500 series trucks. So we didn't need a V8 diesel. Ram went for fuel mileage for the 1500 diesel letting the consumer decide what is important to them. Want to tow a larger RV get the 2500, want to tow a mid sized RV or most any boat get the 1500 with the Eco-Diesel.
My 2004 Ram 5.9 was rated at 305/555 this V8 is rated at 315/555 so it is going to be a great towing engine and still make good fuel mileage. Not the same as the Eco-Diesel but should fall in around the Eco-Boost numbers. Looks like a good fit for Nissan and Toyota. Does anyone know if Toyota is still building a diesel pick up or did they scrap it? Have not heard anything about it.
Don
Rumours of a Tundra Diesel using this engine, but I think that and so do Cummins, that this engine will have more applications in a Motorhome, replacing the V10 Petrol engine. They keep on mentioning it as a replacement for a " V10" in their various PR releases
I recall reading an article that Toyota was going to use the 5.0 cummins in their truck, but they've been silent ever since. Perhaps their kicking around the Hino diesel option as well.
If Toyota would go the Hino route that would be slap #2 on the cummins brand with the Ram providing the first slap.
No would not be looking at Hino, engines are not light duty diesels, although Toyota owns the company. Cummins makes more sense as they have service and parts everywhere in NA
About Travel Trailer Group
44,029 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 28, 2025