Forum Discussion
FishOnOne
Aug 02, 2014Nomad
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:Yellermanx wrote:
Personally I'm more concerned with mp$ than mpg and I imagine the EB does better there, even if the mpg are lower. Gas is much cheaper in most parts of the country so you have to get significantly better mileage with the diesel. Not to mention the oil changes, fuel filters and mess. JMHO
Build a Ram SLT with the Eco-diesel and F-150 Lariat with the 3.5 Eco-boost and the Ram is $1,000 more. Now keep in mind Ford has already said that the are upping the cost of the 2015 F-150 so the peaple saying the ED is a $4000 option are all wet. As far as "oil changes, fuel filters and mess" that's a push unless your saying the EB never needs them :R . BTW the ED uses a 10,000 mile oil change interval, what is the EB oil change interval?
Longevity is not a valid argument with modern engine.
Not sure why you say that
All of this is pretty moot as we don't know any numbers yet.
The Eco Boost doesn't have a fuel filter to replace and the Oil Change Intervals are 10k miles. Not knowing the EB fuel economy numbers, I'm willing to bet the Eco Boost will be much cheaper to operate than a Eco Diesel. Heck I'm hearing the Eco Diesel oil change is over $100.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,029 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 19, 2025