โJan-04-2014 09:53 AM
โJan-06-2014 03:05 AM
โJan-05-2014 06:06 PM
Pirate wrote:
My 2006 chassis could come with 19.5 or 22 wheels. I wonder what exactly Ford did to the chassis to make that difference?
โJan-04-2014 05:58 PM
Pirate wrote:
My 2006 chassis could come with 19.5 or 22 wheels. I wonder what exactly Ford did to the chassis to make that difference?
โJan-04-2014 03:15 PM
โJan-04-2014 03:04 PM
Goldencrazy wrote:
OK. Thanks folks. Scratch that idea. Always looking for ways to modify to improve. This is obviously not one. Buy another lamp.
โJan-04-2014 02:52 PM
โJan-04-2014 02:33 PM
bluwtr49 wrote:
Nice thing about modifications, virtually anything can be done with appropriate input of cubic dollars.
You would have to find a front and rear axles from a class A with 22.5 hubs. Not a big problem. Modifying the new axles to accept your springs, linkages, and etc....again not a problem. You also may have to cut the axle tubes a bit, not a big deal, done all the time by a good shop. They can also change your gear ratio and build the new drive-shaft. You may need fab new springs if you need to lift the coach for clearance.
Alternatively you can just buy a MH with 22.5" tires and same a few $$$
โJan-04-2014 02:32 PM
โJan-04-2014 02:08 PM
โJan-04-2014 01:43 PM
โJan-04-2014 11:24 AM
Goldencrazy wrote:
I notice that people change the tire diameter on cars frequently and in fact we increased the diameter of our tires by 1 inch on our Smart Car and some folks increased by 2 inches. That is all the wheel wells will tolerate. For me the tires were also wider. Made for better ride and stability. I understand that coaches with the 22 inch tires ride better. I seem to have plenty of wheel well room on my Vista 30T. Why shouldn't I consider increasing the diameter when time to change tires. I understand that width might be a problem if I increased because of distance between duals. Any thoughts?
โJan-04-2014 11:19 AM
โJan-04-2014 10:54 AM