โJul-10-2018 11:19 PM
โJul-12-2018 06:13 PM
โJul-12-2018 12:18 PM
โJul-12-2018 11:34 AM
valhalla360 wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
I really don't like to challenge any on your comments as I know you are an intelligent guy and usually agree with your comments BUT I don't see how adding an axle BEHIND your existing axles will change enough to make it worth while. I am not an engineer but the front axle placement has more to do with more or less pin weight. Moving your axles back will do much more.
This part theoretically works.
Assuming evenly spaced axles, the trailer pivots around the center point of the axles.
- With 2 axles, it's halfway between the axles.
- With 3 axles, its around the center axle.
The real problem is by the time you:
- Buy another axle, wheels and tires.
- Pay to have it mounted properly
- Add braking to that axle.
- Reconstruct the side to add wheel wells
I'm betting he could trade to a nice toy hauler and not have a jury rigged design.
โJul-12-2018 10:23 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
I really don't like to challenge any on your comments as I know you are an intelligent guy and usually agree with your comments BUT I don't see how adding an axle BEHIND your existing axles will change enough to make it worth while. I am not an engineer but the front axle placement has more to do with more or less pin weight. Moving your axles back will do much more.
โJul-12-2018 09:50 AM
โJul-12-2018 09:41 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
I agree with Chris, move the axles and get er dun! Other option is get ya one of these.
โJul-12-2018 09:37 AM
laknox wrote:
I still say to travel with full black and grey tanks, and minimal fresh water, and see how that works out before making major mods. Sounds like the OP is likely in a CG, with full hook-ups, so the dump should be no issue.
I'm also troubled by the fact that he stated that the rear tire on his bike was too worn to ride safely back home. Just how long was he gone that a "safe" tire to start with was worn down to "unsafe"? Either that, or just how many burnouts did he do on that tire? :B
Lyle
โJul-12-2018 09:21 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:4x4ord wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
"I don't need to be in the 20-25% range although adding a third axle will put me in that range when the bike is not loaded."
I really don't see how that would happen. Every triple axle has a lower pid that I have seen. Sounds like your axles need to be moved back to get you to 20% or more pin. More would be better then it would come down some with the bike on board.
As to the random "at least it's not a Harley" comment. I went from a 1100 V Star Yami to a 09 HD UltraGlide, no comparison in so many ways.
Moving the axles back does the same thing as adding a third axle behind the tandems. Both place the center of the axles further back from the center of the load.
I really don't like to challenge any on your comments as I know you are an intelligent guy and usually agree with your comments BUT I don't see how adding an axle BEHIND your existing axles will change enough to make it worth while. I am not an engineer but the front axle placement has more to do with more or less pin weight. Moving your axles back will do much more.
โJul-12-2018 08:08 AM
โJul-12-2018 07:17 AM
โJul-12-2018 07:14 AM
BurbMan wrote:
I would have a concern about bending the frame on the 5er with 800 lbs hanging off the back like that. Plus if I had a sweet looking bike like that I sure as shot wouldn't trust it mounted on the back of the trailer. Trading the 5er in for a toy hauler would be a better solution, plus lets the bike ride inside out of the elements.
โJul-12-2018 07:12 AM
4x4ord wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:
"I don't need to be in the 20-25% range although adding a third axle will put me in that range when the bike is not loaded."
I really don't see how that would happen. Every triple axle has a lower pid that I have seen. Sounds like your axles need to be moved back to get you to 20% or more pin. More would be better then it would come down some with the bike on board.
As to the random "at least it's not a Harley" comment. I went from a 1100 V Star Yami to a 09 HD UltraGlide, no comparison in so many ways.
Moving the axles back does the same thing as adding a third axle behind the tandems. Both place the center of the axles further back from the center of the load.
โJul-12-2018 06:01 AM
4x4ord wrote:
With 17 % pin weight the trailer pulls very nice, I don't need to be in the 20-25% range although adding a third axle will put me in that range when the bike is not loaded.
I have a nice enclosed trailer I have double towed behind this trailer. It tows very nice and safe. The problem is the BC government dosn't want us double towing in that province. I want to be able to bring the bike into BC.
โJul-11-2018 08:24 PM
4x4ord wrote:
Citation rates the axles at 7000 lbs. However they are Dexter axles equipped with Dexter disc brakes. In the documents supplied with the trailer is a Dexter brochure. The lightest, disc brake equipped, axle listed in that brochure is an 8000 lb axle. The 7000 lb axle has drum brakes. I kind of think Dexter is rating these axles at 8000 lbs. Even if they are 7000 lb axles.... 7200 vs 7000 is only slightly over the rated capacity.
As far as the frame strength is concerned: this trailer has an exstemely deep frame rail. About 18" deep over the axles and tapering off a little as you move back. I don't think an extra 500 lbs per rail is a big deal.
โJul-11-2018 05:00 PM
bpounds wrote:Me Again wrote:
Adding more weight seems a bit backwards to me. If the trailer tows fine without the MC on the back, then you know it is out of balance. Move the fulcrum(aka axles) and be done with it. Enjoy the rest to the summer. Front over hang/pin box connection may not like the additional weight.
Chris
I've never done it, obviously, but moving axles 20" or whatever, seems not so simple. What do you do with the wheel wells? Cutting and moving spring hangers is one thing, bodywork and paint is another. Clearing slide hardware, utility lines, hydraulic brake lines for his disk brakes...