Apr-26-2022 07:50 AM
Apr-30-2022 07:17 AM
Apr-30-2022 07:08 AM
Apr-30-2022 06:19 AM
bobndot wrote:Rear axels can support 7275 lbs front 4630 lbs DW is 8290 lbs. That leaves 3615 lbs of fluids and stuff which sounds good to me. Seems a lot better than the MB chassis. It sounds like fuel economy is a wash also.
Gjac, I'm not sure how much weight the rear axle can support.
you would have to be careful loading-up that big 'easy to overpack' rear storage compartment.
Yes, I won't miss the jacks either Leveling at a campsite is real easy now. I installed a small set of bubble levels the cab of my 24' C. I have one screwed into the dash and the other over the passenger window. The bubbles tell me at a glance from the drivers seat. I can view N-S-E-W as I pull into a site or parking spot. Hardly ever use my levelers for leveling.
I only use my jacks to lift my rv when doing the tires. I lift it, then use jack-stands to the frame to support its weight.
Apr-27-2022 02:45 AM
Apr-26-2022 06:44 PM
bobndot wrote:Good info Bob, I did not realize they would get 16 MPG That is a significant increase over the 350. As far as the rear overhang the WB to length ratio is 55%. A 24 ft 3 in C on a 350 with a WB of 158 ins would also be 55%. I would miss the hyd jacks also but as some have said with short C's you can jockey the MH in the camp site until it is level. I like the large rear storage bay in the rear, don't like the small corner bed but I guess I could sleep in the upper over cab bed like Phil does. Every thing is a trade off. I did not see an overhead window on the cross trail. The cross trek has one along with other B plus's. The cross trail has an small cab with a single overhead bed.
Our next rv will be a LTV on a Transit.
I think the Transit has a little less GVWR , you would need to watch what you pack into it regarding payload. Just double check on those numbers to verify.
People we know had one , it gets about 16 mpg. It did not need any aftermarket on-ons for suspension flaws. It drives more like a van/suv than a class C.
The cab footwell on the pass side seemed to have more room but the overall cab space is smaller than a 350 cutaway. When you need to go from the cab to the rear of the rv, its a tighter squeeze between the seats. It seemed easier to have a conversation while driving bc it is narrower , so you sit closer to be able to hear voices and it seems to be a more quiet cab.
If i remember correctly the Transit offered at least a pass side swivel seat. The drivers side swivel might be floorplan contingent.
It also seems closer to the ground, it was easier to get into the cab.
Thinking out loud :
What i do not know is the ground clearance or rear overhang situation. That is what i still need to explore bc i do use my rv on dirt roads off grid. I also think i will lose my hydraulic jacks for leveling. But, my new rv will have a comp fridge. Should not be an issue. I think.
Apr-26-2022 06:33 PM
theoldwizard1 wrote:
Newer Transits can be upgraded to swivel seat since they moved the parking brake.
IMHO, Transits need a wider rear axle. The factory passenger van comes standard with a rear A/C unit. Does that mean you have to run the roof A/C on a Class C while you are on the road ?
Apr-26-2022 06:08 PM
Apr-26-2022 12:30 PM
Apr-26-2022 12:25 PM
Apr-26-2022 09:34 AM