cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Sensar vs. Rayzar???

Johno02
Explorer
Explorer
Some time ago, a knowledgeable technician with the proper equipment conducted and posted the actual reception characteristics of various RV antennas, especially comparing the Sensar and the King Jack. I would really like to see some comments ad facts about the new Winegard Razar, and how it compares to the Sensar. A friend purchased a new trailer equipped with the Razar, but we have not had time to compare yet. I have the Sensar IV with the Sensar Pro panel, and am very well pleased with our setup, but I do know that the question about the new Razar will come up, and would like to see some actual results.
Noel and Betty Johnson (and Harry)

2005 GulfStream Ultra Supreme, 1 Old grouch, 1 wonderful wife, and two silly poodles.

12 REPLIES 12

wyocowboy00
Explorer II
Explorer II
wa8yxm wrote:
The last test I saw was a basic Batwing v/s thge Rayzar Automatic.

Batwing won
Now add the Wingman it gets better
Add the Sensar pro. better still.

but the basic Batwing won. Non better made for RV use.

Fixed site I can give you better antennas but not for RV use.


This is all true.

W7GBG
2012 Chev. Silverado 3500HD DRW 4 X 4
2013 Arctic Fox 992 240 watts solar
Jerry & Judy

wa8yxm
Explorer III
Explorer III
The last test I saw was a basic Batwing v/s thge Rayzar Automatic.

Batwing won
Now add the Wingman it gets better
Add the Sensar pro. better still.

but the basic Batwing won. Non better made for RV use.

Fixed site I can give you better antennas but not for RV use.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times

Chris_Bryant
Explorer II
Explorer II
Bill.Satellite wrote:
Assuming you are talking about the Winegard Rayzar automatic (dome style) the Rayzar is nothing like the Jack.


No- the new one. IMHO, a marketing mistake by Winegard- every new antenna is a Razar, from stick on the window sheets to the auto dome. Now the flat Razar (Sensar replacement) is gone- I liked it, as it acted like an omni when flat, bi directional raised, but with decent gain either way.
-- Chris Bryant

Johno02
Explorer
Explorer
Out here in the sticks, everyone used to have a 100' tower with a 15' antenna and rotator. and we still couldn't get the Opry until Monday. Now, with modern satellite and stuff, we get it on Sunday, sometimes if the weather is right.
Noel and Betty Johnson (and Harry)

2005 GulfStream Ultra Supreme, 1 Old grouch, 1 wonderful wife, and two silly poodles.

Johno02
Explorer
Explorer
Yes, talking about the new one that looks a lot like a Jack. I wonder about it being so close to the top of a rig. But I did notice that they have a replacement that fits on an existing mast. If it outperforms the Sensar IV, its gotta be pretty good. Besides that I think the Batwind looks really cool.
Noel and Betty Johnson (and Harry)

2005 GulfStream Ultra Supreme, 1 Old grouch, 1 wonderful wife, and two silly poodles.

stevekk
Explorer
Explorer
I think he is talking about the new Winegard Rayzar Z1.
Looks like the Jack.
Got mixed reviews on Amazon, but a low number of reviews.

Bill_Satellite
Explorer II
Explorer II
Assuming you are talking about the Winegard Rayzar automatic (dome style) the Rayzar is nothing like the Jack.
What I post is my 2 cents and nothing more. Please don't read anything into my post that's not there. If you disagree, that's OK.
Can't we all just get along?

Johno02
Explorer
Explorer
I can get over 60 mile range with our Sensar IV(flat country).
Noel and Betty Johnson (and Harry)

2005 GulfStream Ultra Supreme, 1 Old grouch, 1 wonderful wife, and two silly poodles.

Johno02
Explorer
Explorer
Let us know how it works when you get it installed.
Noel and Betty Johnson (and Harry)

2005 GulfStream Ultra Supreme, 1 Old grouch, 1 wonderful wife, and two silly poodles.

Chris_Bryant
Explorer II
Explorer II
Keep in mind the Razar has changed- it was a flat panel that I thought worked quite well for a number of reasons. The current Razar is more like the Jack. I'm installing one tomorrow, but I don't have a rig with a Sensar available to do a comparison, though I know what we usually receive here.
-- Chris Bryant

Bill_Satellite
Explorer II
Explorer II
The Sensar IV is still the best antenna available.
What I post is my 2 cents and nothing more. Please don't read anything into my post that's not there. If you disagree, that's OK.
Can't we all just get along?

96Bounder30E
Explorer II
Explorer II
Moved from General RV'ing
Eric
96 Bounder 30E-F53(460)
stock Ford intake w/K&N air filter
used Thorley headers
new Banks resonator, muffler, tail pipe and 4" polished SS exhaust tip