cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Solar-Low Light Performance

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Been lots of posts about which kind of cell makes for best low-light output-amorphous, mono, or poly.

I have just stumbled across something quite different on that concerning the number of bus bars on a cell. (Google solar bus bars to see images etc)

Apparently there is a dispute or two about the true value of additional bus bars per cell where perhaps the bars themselves create shading, or whether you get more current if all you do is have four thin bars instead of two fat ones. I gather having more allows for shorter fingers paths which helps gather current. Not too clear to me.

Anyway, it is another aspect to the whole discussion I have not seen mentioned here.

EG you see advertising that four bars is good for low light which gets you more over-all daily total AH. EG this (AFAIK these are Canadian Solar panels rebranded as stated):

http://www.wegosolar.com/products.php?product=HES%252d260-Solar-Panel-260W
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.
2 REPLIES 2

JiminDenver
Explorer II
Explorer II
It could be voltage drop or having more points to collect the energy from the cell.
2011 GulfStream Amerilite 25BH
2003 Ford Expedition with 435w tilting portable/ TS-MPPT-45
750w solar , TS-MPPT-60 on the trailer
675 Ah bank, Trip-lite 1250fc inverter
Sportsman 2200w inverter generator

jrnymn7
Explorer
Explorer
hmmm, like with so many things, it seems to be about reducing Rcircuit, and thus voltage drop.