โMay-06-2015 07:16 PM
โJul-06-2015 09:16 PM
skripo wrote:How are you measuring the output?
So I finally got it all up and running but am not sure it's working correctly.
I believe I get 54 volts at 100 watts, 2 amps in full sunlight. Am I not supposed to get close to 270 watts (2 x 135)?
I suspect I do not understand the math properly. I also may have misstated the amps but will check again tomorrow.
โJul-06-2015 05:55 PM
โMay-11-2015 06:43 AM
โMay-11-2015 06:33 AM
โMay-10-2015 06:28 PM
โMay-07-2015 02:30 PM
โMay-07-2015 10:17 AM
pianotuna wrote:
Since the die is cast, I would get three panels in total. I have a hunch these panels may disappear.
โMay-07-2015 10:09 AM
westend wrote:pianotuna wrote:
Hi westend,
My panels are on aluminum "bodies", so they are installed in the same manner as the more traditional glass and aluminum format.
I was thinking this may be the best, a panel of aluminum would definitely dissipate a good amount of heat.
For the OP's situation, just using the factory adhesive back may be enough. I don't have any experience with them so can't say it will or won't be adequate. I do know that 3M VHB tape is very strong. In fact, we have a few members here that have used it for solar module installations and has been a good solution. Some have used it just on the "feet" of mounting brackets. That is a small amount of square inches in relation to the larger area of a big solar module.
The suggestion to purchase three modules while they are available is a good one. Most MPPT algorithms and the system don't get along good with mismatched modules. I bought one of the USA made MX Solar modules at Solar Blvd. It's a good module but MX Solar closed their US plant and availability is scant to no more. As with most solar hobbyists, I'd now like to have more power harvest but getting the same module is going to be a challenge.
โMay-07-2015 09:59 AM
pianotuna wrote:
Hi westend,
My panels are on aluminum "bodies", so they are installed in the same manner as the more traditional glass and aluminum format.
โMay-07-2015 08:16 AM
โMay-07-2015 08:15 AM
โMay-07-2015 06:17 AM
westend wrote:
The only way the efficiency of the module could change with orientation is if you park the RV in a certain direction, continually, or have shade interference issues. I guess I would orient it with the least amount of forward edge facing the front. A lot would depend on future plans.
Have you investigated any efficiency differences regarding mounting the module on a rigid substrate? I'm thinking that you may be able to keep the module cooler by elevating it above the roof surface. That may pay a significant dividend with power in warmer climes. Maybe not. Pianotuna has similar type of modules on his Class C. He might be a good source of info about installing or using these modules.
Another thing noted: You're paying more than market rate $$$/watt. You may have considerations about installation of rigid frame modules or ease of installation we're not privy to. Basic consideration is that a rigid module has better $$$/watt and the price of aluminum angle mounts is much less than the difference in price from the bendable module.
โMay-07-2015 05:27 AM
โMay-07-2015 04:58 AM