โSep-08-2016 11:25 AM
โSep-11-2016 10:04 PM
โSep-10-2016 04:19 PM
โSep-09-2016 06:02 PM
โSep-09-2016 03:32 PM
โSep-09-2016 03:27 PM
โSep-09-2016 03:25 PM
โSep-09-2016 12:36 PM
GordonThree wrote:DrewE wrote:GordonThree wrote:dave17352 wrote:GordonThree wrote:You must be joking right?
Did you severely injure the tree when you hit it with your vehicle? It's a shame that a healthy tree should be removed.
What don't you understand about my question? I can understand an injured tree being cut down, but a healthy one, it makes no sense to kill it for someone's mistake.
Maybe, just maybe, the management of the campground realized that the tree was in the way of the intended use of the campsite, and thought it better to remove it than to limit the site to small units. I suspect they may have erred originally in leaving it there when laying out the campground or possibly when reconfiguring the site, as evidenced by their agreement to cover the damage to the poster's RV and their quickness to remove the tree.
Obviously one wants to avoid backing into anything, tree or otherwise, when maneuvering a vehicle. That doesn't mean, however, that a campground would want to leave obstacles directly in the path of people setting up camp. From the description I've read here, it sure sounds like the tree was rather blocking the site, being at the end of the pad for the RV where the back end would of necessity need to hang out.
Sounds like a valid reason to cut down all the trees in a campground, in one way or another they'll be in someones way. Then monster rigs can park whichever way they want in any site... oh wait, they have those "parks" already, they're called RV resorts.
Nothing but pavement, maybe some grass here or there - I don't know about grass though, it's worse than trees. It gets in the way too, right when its least expected, the grass will turn to mud and trap rigs.
โSep-09-2016 10:56 AM
DrewE wrote:GordonThree wrote:dave17352 wrote:GordonThree wrote:You must be joking right?
Did you severely injure the tree when you hit it with your vehicle? It's a shame that a healthy tree should be removed.
What don't you understand about my question? I can understand an injured tree being cut down, but a healthy one, it makes no sense to kill it for someone's mistake.
Maybe, just maybe, the management of the campground realized that the tree was in the way of the intended use of the campsite, and thought it better to remove it than to limit the site to small units. I suspect they may have erred originally in leaving it there when laying out the campground or possibly when reconfiguring the site, as evidenced by their agreement to cover the damage to the poster's RV and their quickness to remove the tree.
Obviously one wants to avoid backing into anything, tree or otherwise, when maneuvering a vehicle. That doesn't mean, however, that a campground would want to leave obstacles directly in the path of people setting up camp. From the description I've read here, it sure sounds like the tree was rather blocking the site, being at the end of the pad for the RV where the back end would of necessity need to hang out.
โSep-09-2016 10:28 AM
GordonThree wrote:dave17352 wrote:GordonThree wrote:You must be joking right?
Did you severely injure the tree when you hit it with your vehicle? It's a shame that a healthy tree should be removed.
What don't you understand about my question? I can understand an injured tree being cut down, but a healthy one, it makes no sense to kill it for someone's mistake.
โSep-09-2016 09:03 AM
dave17352 wrote:GordonThree wrote:You must be joking right?
Did you severely injure the tree when you hit it with your vehicle? It's a shame that a healthy tree should be removed.
โSep-09-2016 08:53 AM
GordonThree wrote:You must be joking right?
Did you severely injure the tree when you hit it with your vehicle? It's a shame that a healthy tree should be removed.
โSep-09-2016 07:46 AM
โSep-08-2016 07:06 PM
โSep-08-2016 05:25 PM