Oct-05-2014 05:32 AM
Oct-06-2014 10:59 AM
Oct-06-2014 06:13 AM
Dave Pete wrote:
Wow! The boat things are just Wow!
Thanks everyone for your input and thoughts. It seems to me the final answer is "there really isn't a Class A Vintage MH definition" as there may be in "classic automobiles" for example. And maybe I have that wrong too. When I was a kid, an antique auto was 50 or more years old and a classic auto was 25 years or more. But of course "vintage" is always changing based on the sub-group who is involved in it, and the overall length of time the object has been around. I suppose it would be safe to say early 70's Winnebagos, GMCs, early bus chassis MH manufacturer built MHs like Prevost and Bluebird, etc. all qualify. Anyway it's fun to see your answers, thanks again. For me, thinking through all this stuff is half the fun.
Oct-06-2014 06:08 AM
Oct-05-2014 09:02 PM
Oct-05-2014 07:36 PM
THOSE THAT DO NOT KNOW HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT
Oct-05-2014 07:10 PM
ferndaleflyer wrote:
Sure doubt that anyone would pay up to a million for a "wore out bus chassis". Many are built on NEW Prevost chassis and these are available often.....
Oct-05-2014 06:58 PM
rgatijnet1 wrote:RayChez wrote:
I believe vintage coaches would be twenty and older. That is what it is on automobiles, so it probably would be after twenty.
Have read several RVer's recommending Prevosts and MCI etc etc. These chassis would have to be old bus chassis in order to be vintage. Now it sounds nice to say get a old Prevost, but you also have to think, how many miles this chassis has on it when being used as a commercial bus. Probably a million miles before they retire them. So my point is that it is going to take lots of money to restore that chassis and parts and engines do not come cheap. So you got to consider how much it would take to restore and whether it is worth it, and you also have to figure that it is old and a lot of places they will not even let you in the RV parks. They do not have slides which makes it pretty crowded in comparison to todays coaches with lots of room.
Personally I would not take an old Prevost or MCI etc. Things wear out no matter how good it was built when it was new.
You can do what ever turns you on, but what I just posted is something to think about.
They have been building top of the line RV's on Prevost and MCI chassis for well over 20 years. In fact, the link I gave a few posts back showed a 1985 Prevost RV with ONLY 108,000 miles. That would be hardly worn and it certainly meets your standard of over 20 years old. That one did not have slides but slides started on the Prevost chassis about the same time they started on the other brands.
Here is a 1988 Prevost with 44,000 miles and a slide. Again, not worn out and certainly ready for tens of thousands of more miles without a concern. Liberty Coach
Oct-05-2014 05:26 PM
Oct-05-2014 05:17 PM
Oct-05-2014 02:02 PM
RayChez wrote:
I believe vintage coaches would be twenty and older. That is what it is on automobiles, so it probably would be after twenty.
Have read several RVer's recommending Prevosts and MCI etc etc. These chassis would have to be old bus chassis in order to be vintage. Now it sounds nice to say get a old Prevost, but you also have to think, how many miles this chassis has on it when being used as a commercial bus. Probably a million miles before they retire them. So my point is that it is going to take lots of money to restore that chassis and parts and engines do not come cheap. So you got to consider how much it would take to restore and whether it is worth it, and you also have to figure that it is old and a lot of places they will not even let you in the RV parks. They do not have slides which makes it pretty crowded in comparison to todays coaches with lots of room.
Personally I would not take an old Prevost or MCI etc. Things wear out no matter how good it was built when it was new.
You can do what ever turns you on, but what I just posted is something to think about.
Oct-05-2014 01:36 PM
Oct-05-2014 11:48 AM
moonlightrunner wrote:
I beleive if it's no longer made, it's considered vintage in the auto world. In the RVing world, if it's over 10yo it's vintage. That because manufactured RVs don't hold up too well unless very good care was taken. I suggest that you find something you REALLY like, buy the best example that you can and keep it up from there. Some friends of mine decided to keep their mid '90's Jeep and completely fix it back up rather than buy another used something that they didn't know the issues with. Their theory is that you always hear of the one or two owner classic that was taken care of thru the years. So why not do that with a vehicle they already have $$ invested in. Makes sense to me. Like all those folks who buy a clapped out Airstream and then renovate it. Why not renovate the not so old thing you already have or are looking to buy if you like it even if it's not really "vintage" or "retro" or what ever the popular term is this week? Be easier to get certain parts too. The price difference between "older" and "vintage/collectors" RVs can be a lot of money that can go into repairs and updating.
Oct-05-2014 07:52 AM
Oct-05-2014 07:51 AM
Oct-05-2014 07:42 AM