Wrong Pump in AZ

[fischer]

Just read about ging to the wrong pump in Arizona at truck stops. If you have 3 axels or over 26,000 lbs rig and your diesel. Fine is 1000 dollars if you use the car pumps.
Did you big guys already know this

[Rollnhome]

Unsigned letter. No letterhead. Addressing Mr. L... and stating if you own a motorhome. Does this apply to me also?

[BobGed]

jlabr2 wrote:
Well, shoot. My so-called computer skills suck. I can't figure out how to get his attachment to show up. It in downloaded in my computer.

If you don't already have one, you can get a free Dropbox account HERE, upload the file to the Public folder and then post a link to that file here. Then anyone that wants the file can download it.

[msmith1199]

jlabr2 wrote:
Well, shoot. My so-called computer skills suck. I can't figure out how to get his attachment to show up. It in downloaded in my computer.

I don't think attachments will work on here. You would have to convert it to a jpeg or a bmp and post it to photobucket or a site like that and link it here.

[msmith1199]

lbligh wrote:

msmith1199 wrote:

jlabr2 wrote:

lbligh wrote:
My guess is that organizationally an Administrator does not have the authority to publish anything without Director level and legal department approval.

Yes, as you read my post, I am also concerned with this and that is why I am requesting this in black and white from Mark Zimmerman who is the head of The Revenue and Fuel Tax Administration. And I thought the main subject is "fuel tax". Geeez who's side are you on in this discussion. I understand being cautious and wanting the facts or truth, but your negative attitude that I get from your posts is not helping us get to the real meaning of this law.

Rant over.

He's dug himself such a deep hole here that he's trying to save face now.

My friend, that simply is not true. I have said from the very beginning, if someone with authority is willing to publicly publish a position from the State of Arizona, we all are better off. That does not mean an e-mail from some guy that may or may not have that authority. Also, as I have said before, people at the other end of a telephone and e-mails written by someone without authority are meaningless as is anyone's personal opinion... even yours.

Yes we all know what you've said and we've all seen your insults. Get over yourself.

[jlabr2]

Well, shoot. My so-called computer skills suck. I can't figure out how to get his attachment to show up. It in downloaded in my computer.

[jlabr2]

Wow, I received Marks reply already!


Mr. Labertew:



As we discussed, if you own a motor home (RV) that is not subject to the weight fee as provided in ARS 28-5432, you are allowed to fuel your vehicle at the $.18 pump. Should you fuel at a $.26 pump, you may go inside the retail station and request an $.08 refund from the cashier.



I have also attached a policy memo regarding motor homes. Pay close attention to letter B, which states, “A motor home is exempt from weight fees unless being used in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise.”



Please call or email with any questions.



Take care,

Mark





Mark Zimmerman
Senior Division Administrator

Revenue and Fuel Tax Administration
1801 W. Jefferson St., Mail Drop 501M
Phoenix, AZ 85007
602.712.8381
www.azdot.gov

Description: http://adotnet/divisions/communications/graphic_standards/Logos/4email/adot_FMS_email.jpg

He sent this attachment also.



So what do we think about this info?

[jlabr2]

lbligh wrote:
I am on the side of getting accurate information published from someone with authority. Frankly, I hope that this guy is correct and we get a published document.

Thanks for the work you have done to get us this far.

Cool! Positive feedback. I hope we get what we want from Mark Zimmerman.

[Trumpet_Player]

jlabr2 wrote:

lbligh wrote:
My guess is that organizationally an Administrator does not have the authority to publish anything without Director level and legal department approval.

Yes, as you read my post, I am also concerned with this and that is why I am requesting this in black and white from Mark Zimmerman who is the head of The Revenue and Fuel Tax Administration. And I thought the main subject is "fuel tax". Geeez who's side are you on in this discussion. I understand being cautious and wanting the facts or truth, but your negative attitude that I get from your posts is not helping us get to the real meaning of this law.

Rant over.

I am not on anyone's side. I am on the side of getting accurate information published from someone with authority. Frankly, I hope that this guy is correct and we get a published document.

Thanks for the work you have done to get us this far.

[Rollnhome]

He was a firm beliver that RVs were exempt 2 years ago....then a call to ADOT, to a nondescript person on the phone, said no RVs are not exempt changed his mind. Now he is so dug in they are not exempt only a proclamation from the Governor of exempt status may change his position.

[xctraveler]

BigBlockTank wrote:
What was the original question 21 pages ago?

We will need a quorum to determine the answer to that. Count me out, we are leaving for dinner out and I presume this will all go away before I get back in a couple of hours.

[msmith1199]

BigBlockTank wrote:
What was the original question 21 pages ago?

There was a question?

[Trumpet_Player]

msmith1199 wrote:

jlabr2 wrote:

lbligh wrote:
My guess is that organizationally an Administrator does not have the authority to publish anything without Director level and legal department approval.

Yes, as you read my post, I am also concerned with this and that is why I am requesting this in black and white from Mark Zimmerman who is the head of The Revenue and Fuel Tax Administration. And I thought the main subject is "fuel tax". Geeez who's side are you on in this discussion. I understand being cautious and wanting the facts or truth, but your negative attitude that I get from your posts is not helping us get to the real meaning of this law.

Rant over.

He's dug himself such a deep hole here that he's trying to save face now.

My friend, that simply is not true. I have said from the very beginning, if someone with authority is willing to publicly publish a position from the State of Arizona, we all are better off. That does not mean an e-mail from some guy that may or may not have that authority. Also, as I have said before, people at the other end of a telephone and e-mails written by someone without authority are meaningless as is anyone's personal opinion... even yours.

[BigBlockTank]

What was the original question 21 pages ago?

[msmith1199]

jlabr2 wrote:

lbligh wrote:
My guess is that organizationally an Administrator does not have the authority to publish anything without Director level and legal department approval.

Yes, as you read my post, I am also concerned with this and that is why I am requesting this in black and white from Mark Zimmerman who is the head of The Revenue and Fuel Tax Administration. And I thought the main subject is "fuel tax". Geeez who's side are you on in this discussion. I understand being cautious and wanting the facts or truth, but your negative attitude that I get from your posts is not helping us get to the real meaning of this law.

Rant over.

He's dug himself such a deep hole here that he's trying to save face now.