cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Using RG-11 with Winegard Satellite???

darleyhavidson
Explorer
Explorer
Ok, I emailed the company (Winegard) to ask if RG-11 coax cable could be used with their Playmaker satellite. They only recommended RG-6. So, I asked if they have ever tested the system with RG-11 and they replied they had no knowledge of that.

The main reason I ask is that the manufacturer of the RG-11 indicates that the cable may not be compatible with certain satellites. And to query the satellite manufacturer first to ensure there will be no issues.

Well, I tried that to no avail. So, I ask the masses, what say you?

(FYI: I want to use aerial RG-11 coax since I have a long run (88 feet) and will be placing the cable in the trees enroute to where the satellite is positioned.)
20 REPLIES 20

wa8yxm
Explorer III
Explorer III
In my research I have confirmed that top quality RG-58 beats low end RG-6

But.... Remember Motor homes are generallyu built of LOWEST BIDDER cable

Which is why I recommend RG-6 fOR sat. though as I said above, RG-11 will work.

I have about a mile of RG xx in this house between the rube goldburg TV system the TS-2000 and the other radios. Assorted flavors even 50' of LMR-40.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times

Tom_M1
Explorer
Explorer
fpresto wrote:
Not all RGs are equal either. In our lab we often found that a good quality RG-58 would easily outperform a cheap RG-6.
I assume you meant RG-59. RG-58 is 50 ohm.
Tom
2005 Born Free 24RB
170ah Renogy LiFePo4 drop-in battery 400 watts solar
Towing 2016 Mini Cooper convertible on tow dolly
Minneapolis, MN

rrupert
Explorer
Explorer
Unless you're going a long distance I can't see much advantage in doing that. The shortest distance and the least amount of connectors is the goal to minimize signal loss.
Rich and Joyce
2018 Jayco Jay Flight 21QB
2012 Ford F150 4X4 Supercrew EcoBoost
Reese Strait-Line Dual Cam Hitch

Amateur Radio K3EXU

fpresto
Explorer
Explorer
I have worked with both. The major difference between RG-6 and RG-11 is cable size. RG-11 is much stiffer and thicker. It is much more difficult to work with. Unless you are making runs of 500ft or more the slight gain of RG-11 over RG-6 is probably not worth it. I am not surprised that Winegard would have no reason to test it as it is not practical to use with their systems. It is interesting to note that there is no standard for RG designations. That is a term that was used by the military back in the 40s and 50s and stood for Radio Grade. It has long been superseded by MIL-Spec. I could take any piece of wire, stamp RG-6 on and sell it as RG-6. Not all RGs are equal either. In our lab we often found that a good quality RG-58 would easily outperform a cheap RG-6.
USN Retired
2016 Tiffin Allegro 32 SA

2oldman
Explorer II
Explorer II
Info about cables
"If I'm wearing long pants, I'm too far north" - 2oldman

wa8yxm
Explorer III
Explorer III
Did a bit of research. RG-11 should work fine, It is a 75 Ohm Coax. same as RG-6, but RG-11 has lower loss per unit length so it should actually outperform RG-6 The only other possible concern would be center conductor size. And since it omes with "F" connectors I am assuming downright close.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times