cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

New National Park video rules

agesilaus
Explorer III
Explorer III
The NPS has issued an interim set of rules for photography/videography in their lands:
RVMiles

They lost a lawsuit about this and have thrown in the towel, it sounds like normal filming will require no permit unless the activity disrupts park activities. This episode of RVMiles is one of the good ones with Jason (?) by himself getting to the point quickly. Not the Mutt and Jeffette irritating scripted episodes.
Arctic Fox 25Y Travel Trailer
2018 RAM 2500 6.7L 4WD shortbed
Straightline dual cam hitch
400W Solar with Victron controller
Superbumper
5 REPLIES 5

valhalla360
Nomad III
Nomad III
4x4van wrote:
no one has the right to deny access the way that Lwiddis claims.


Enforced by legal authority and the park rangers...you are correct.

Being officious and domineering of the area they want such that most people will bow to their will, they sure will.
Tammy & Mike
Ford F250 V10
2021 Gray Wolf
Gemini Catamaran 34'
Full Time spliting time between boat and RV

4x4van
Explorer III
Explorer III
agesilaus wrote:
Lwiddis wrote:
An unfortunate court decision. Hopefully Congress will review and act. Watch the officious film crew guards deny the public access or movement until their โ€œshotโ€ is done. Disruption by walking through is a possible tool for those filming and denying the publicโ€™s access.


I've been in NPS parks of one sort or another hundreds of times and have never run into anything like what you describe. Their regs allow them to restrict or deny that sort of activity anyway.

Isn't it a quirk of English when using a non film camera is called filming, I'd think someone would have coinded a new word. Of course there is 'videography' but that's too formal and clumsy.
Agreed. This is a non-issue. It only applies to "low-impact" filming, and no one has the right to deny access the way that Lwiddis claims.
We don't stop playing because we grow old...We grow old because we stop playing!

2004 Itasca Sunrise M-30W
Carson enclosed ATV Trailer
-'85 ATC250R, '12 Husky TE310, '20 CanAm X3 X rs Turbo RR
Zieman Jetski Trailer
-'96 GTi, '96 Waveblaster II

agesilaus
Explorer III
Explorer III
Lwiddis wrote:
An unfortunate court decision. Hopefully Congress will review and act. Watch the officious film crew guards deny the public access or movement until their โ€œshotโ€ is done. Disruption by walking through is a possible tool for those filming and denying the publicโ€™s access.


I've been in NPS parks of one sort or another hundreds of times and have never run into anything like what you describe. Their regs allow them to restrict or deny that sort of activity anyway.

Isn't it a quirk of English when using a non film camera is called filming, I'd think someone would have coinded a new word. Of course there is 'videography' but that's too formal and clumsy.
Arctic Fox 25Y Travel Trailer
2018 RAM 2500 6.7L 4WD shortbed
Straightline dual cam hitch
400W Solar with Victron controller
Superbumper

valhalla360
Nomad III
Nomad III
https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/02-22-21-interim-guidance-for-filming-in-parks.htm

The actual rules not some youtube guys opinion of them.

Most likely these are interim because the lawyers are rewriting them to be more agnostic but they are likely to come back... and should.
Tammy & Mike
Ford F250 V10
2021 Gray Wolf
Gemini Catamaran 34'
Full Time spliting time between boat and RV

Lwiddis
Explorer II
Explorer II
An unfortunate court decision. Hopefully Congress will review and act. Watch the officious film crew guards deny the public access or movement until their โ€œshotโ€ is done. Disruption by walking through is a possible tool for those filming and denying the publicโ€™s access.
Winnebago 2101DS TT & 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71, WindyNation 300 watt solar-Lossigy 200 AH Lithium battery. Prefer boondocking, USFS, COE, BLM, NPS, TVA, state camps. Bicyclist. 14 yr. Army -11B40 then 11A - (MOS 1542 & 1560) IOBC & IOAC grad