โJun-12-2019 07:45 PM
โJun-18-2019 05:42 AM
Scottiemom wrote:
And lastly, the one comment I love from pet owners whose dogs are NEVER leashed in a campground. . . "It's okay, he's friendly." I say, "Well mine might not be." In truth he was, but again. . . if a dog charges up to mine. . . all bets are off.
โJun-17-2019 10:38 AM
โJun-17-2019 03:13 AM
โJun-16-2019 11:27 AM
โJun-16-2019 10:39 AM
โJun-16-2019 06:09 AM
โJun-16-2019 05:21 AM
โJun-15-2019 09:35 AM
โJun-14-2019 11:12 PM
Lantley wrote:toedtoes wrote:BCSnob wrote:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/30836/jack-russell-tops-cops-list-of-dogs-most-likely-to-bite-humans/
The dangerous breed list changes with breed popularity.
Yep. As soon as people start getting dogs because of a tv show, movie, celebrity, etc., that breed starts having "aggression" issues. But it can't simply be because people get dogs that they don't understand, are unwilling or incapable of training, and/or breed indiscriminately. No, it must be that the breed "is bad".
What's ironic is that a few of the breeds on the list are used in law enforcement and the military, Because they are intelligent and have predictable behaviors.
These same breeds are focused and can perform life saving/threatening task under pressure. But yet they are not worthy of entering a CG.
A lot of the breed list is based on hype and not actual data.
โJun-14-2019 09:16 PM
BB_TX wrote:
After all is said and done, it still comes down to a simple fact. The large powerful breeds are capable of inflicting significant physical damage IF they do bite. And no RV park owner has the time or expertise to determine the personality of every dog that may enter their park. Yes, you are probably more likely to be bitten by a high strung little yapper than a large dog. But where the yapper may break the skin and cause some bleeding, that large dog can tear flesh and muscle. I am not opposed to large breeds by any means. My Golden weighs 88 lbs. But the large dogs do require special considerations by their owners and by those who own or operate facilities in which they may enter.
โJun-14-2019 09:07 PM
toedtoes wrote:BCSnob wrote:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/30836/jack-russell-tops-cops-list-of-dogs-most-likely-to-bite-humans/
The dangerous breed list changes with breed popularity.
Yep. As soon as people start getting dogs because of a tv show, movie, celebrity, etc., that breed starts having "aggression" issues. But it can't simply be because people get dogs that they don't understand, are unwilling or incapable of training, and/or breed indiscriminately. No, it must be that the breed "is bad".
โJun-14-2019 06:16 PM
BCSnob wrote:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/30836/jack-russell-tops-cops-list-of-dogs-most-likely-to-bite-humans/
The dangerous breed list changes with breed popularity.
โJun-14-2019 05:49 PM
โJun-14-2019 04:47 PM
BCSnob wrote:BB_TX wrote:So do you consider JRTs little yappers? I think youโd find this small breed (do to the genetics of this breed) can do more damage than youโve described.
Yes, you are probably more likely to be bitten by a high strung little yapper than a large dog. But where the yapper may break the skin and cause some bleeding,....
........
.