cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

How common are parks with "cheater" 50amp service?

TDIStan
Explorer
Explorer
How common are parks with "cheater" 50amp service? By "cheater" 50amp service I mean a standard NMEA 14-50R outlet that has been wired with BOTH hot terminals on the same 120v leg. "Cheater" 50amp service does not provide 240v - only two 120v circuits.

If you have encountered parks that are wired this way, how recently? Is there a pattern that might predict where/when to be suspicious? Regions of the country? Private vs public lands parks? Age of the park? I am not confident that the person answering the reservation phone will know the difference.

I know that most rigs with 50a shore power cords will run OK off of a "cheater" outlet, but this fall I will be traveling with both my RV and a PEV - Plugin Electric Vehicle. The PEV is not towable - my wife will drive it while I drive the rig. Our driving days will be short so that the PEV will arrive at the next park ready to be recharged.

The PEV charges from a "standard" NMEA 14-50R, 240v/50a outlet, wired as per the NEC. If we arrive at a park with "cheater" wiring we're in trouble - we can get a few miles overnight from a 120v/20a outlet, but not a full day's driving. Knowing that the park we're headed to has a proper 240v/50a supply would mean peace of mind.

Thanks for your help.
108 REPLIES 108

pnichols
Explorer II
Explorer II
I'm definitely not against all of us getting around in some new kinds of ways that do way less harm to the Earth ... including RV'ing, flying, hunting, boating, taking kids to soccer practice, train trips, etc..

I'm not sure electric power is the answer though - not until the electric power can be created with no damage to the atmosphere and can be stored in batteries that are very clean to produce and dispose of.

Reading this if all/any of us expect to need transportation 12 years from now on-up, we better start doing something different (including good A/C systems in our RVs): https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/07/world/climate-change-new-ipcc-report-wxc/index.html
2005 E450 Itasca 24V Class C

MrWizard
Moderator
Moderator
time2roll wrote:
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
"Feel Good" will not do a damned bit of good to lower the percentage. The entire world needs to do it. Kumbayah? 99.9% of the solar panels China makes is to power homes not motor vehicles.
China actually is leading with more plug-in vehicles than the US and growing faster.


i think you will find those 'plugin' vehicles are mostly electric scooters, and scooter based delivery vehicles

NOT 4 passenger automobiles
I can explain it to you.
But I Can Not understand it for you !

....

Connected using T-Mobile Home internet and Visible Phone service
1997 F53 Bounder 36s

westernrvparkow
Explorer
Explorer
time2roll wrote:
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
"Feel Good" will not do a damned bit of good to lower the percentage. The entire world needs to do it. Kumbayah? 99.9% of the solar panels China makes is to power homes not motor vehicles.
China actually is leading with more plug-in vehicles than the US and growing faster.
China is also the leading consumer of coal. China accounts for nearly half of the coal consumption worldwide. They use more than 4 times more than the next closest nation, the US. Maybe increasing electrical demand in China is not an ecological panacea.

time2roll
Nomad
Nomad
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
"Feel Good" will not do a damned bit of good to lower the percentage. The entire world needs to do it. Kumbayah? 99.9% of the solar panels China makes is to power homes not motor vehicles.
China actually is leading with more plug-in vehicles than the US and growing faster.

Dusty_R
Explorer
Explorer
Michigan ranks 47th out of the 48 Continental States sunshine. So why are there solar panels going up here? It would seem to me that it is much more practical/cost effective, to put them where there is much more sunshine.

Dusty

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
What I find interesting is folks who saw and chop their own firewood seem to be less radical about where their electricity comes from. If they boondock or just off grid that is one thing, but on-grid homeowners who process their own airtight stove wood seem to have considerably less enthusiasm for electric cars as well.

The USA may end up with two hundred million electric vehicles while the rest of the world ends up with two billion combustion engine vehicles.

With energy and pollution only the bottom line has validity. And the numbers I see above raise my eyebrows. Lower CO2? Like that little old lady squealed when she lifted the bun "Where's The Beef?"

"Feel Good" will not do a damned bit of good to lower the percentage. The entire world needs to do it. Kumbayah? 99.9% of the solar panels China makes is to power homes not motor vehicles.

I just hate it to be seated next to people at a theater movie when I have the plot in a bag boredom is setting in and other people are ecstatically oohing and awing.

Gdetrailer
Explorer III
Explorer III
pnichols wrote:

Renewable energy sourcing of our stick-house electricity can be provided - if we choose it - by our power company. BUT ... they want to charge MORE for it than getting it from their other regular sources for our home's electrictiy. Go figure!

EV owners should not get free or below-market cost electricty for their vehicles. If so, the rest of us our paying for it for them. That's not right.


Correct on BOTH counts.

Electric customers in PA has had for many years the option to choose where and how the power for their home or business is generated. I could choose a "renewable" only power source, but if I did, it would easily increase my power bill by 50%!

Dyed in the wool pro "renewable" folks stick their heads in the sand believing that "renewable" energy is "clean" AND "CHEAP", it is neither.

Solar only works when the sun shines AND it HAS to be a pretty CLEAR DAY, heavy cloudy, overcast, rainy, snowy day(s) IT DOESN'T WORK well enough to produce enough energy to PAY BACK THE MONEY SPENT ON SOLAR!

Not to mention, solar power MUST be "converted" from DC to AC, that takes HUGE EXPENSIVE INVERTERS.

Wind generation only happens when there is enough wind, that means they must find suitable sites which have at least CONSTANT 12 MPH and higher winds, less than 12 MPH and not enough power to light a single LED..

TOO MUCH wind and they MUST turn the wind turbine out of the wind..

Typically anything over 20 MPH and they must shut down the turbines to prevent overspeeding which can easily destroy hundreds of thousands of Dollars invested in one wind turbine..

The cost of purchasing, installation and ongoing maintenance MUST be accounted for and in the end those supposed "renewables" end up costing the POCO much more to generate power than traditional methods.

The cost of buying, installing, maintaining is cost averaged over the "expected" life of the installation. And you the consumer takes it on the chin..

As far as EV owners getting a "free ride" or subsidized low cost charge, yeah, you might be getting that now, but eventually it WILL catch up to you in one way or another..

It may mean you pay a yearly "use tax" to register your car, it may mean a special smart meter system on your car that computes and reports your use to a tax office and you get a bill in the mail..

Or it could simply mean that EVERYONE MUST SUFFER WITH ADDITIONAL TAXES ADDED TO THE ELECTRIC BILLS..

It may even mean that you might even get BOTH a smart meter AND much higher electric bill taxes..

IF everyone changed from gas/Diesel to electric only then State and Federal road use taxes revenue stream would drop to zero.. Those taxes are used to build and maintain the roads we ALL use and without that revenue stream the Government WILL have to FIND ANOTHER WAY TO GET THAT MONEY..

Something else to consider, your batteries lose capacity EACH TIME YOU CHARGE/DISCHARGE, eventually you WILL be forced to spend an outrageous cost of replacement batteries or buying a new vehicle, IF the manufacturer is still "supporting" your vehicle..

Most likely will happen before you ever get it paid off..

Then there will be the mountains of spend EV batteries laying around that are simply not economically feasible to recycle. It costs MORE to recycle Lithium based batteries than if you use all new materials..

At least with Lead acid batteries, they can reclaim nearly 100% of the lead at much lower cost than the raw materials..

There is no "common" battery pack for any EVs, you can't plant just any battery into any EV.. The only way EV can make some sort of economical sense is if ALL of manufacturers would agree to ONE COMMON battery standard..

Standardization is key to making a product at a lower cost, Henry Ford understood that and that is how he was able to make a Model T at a much lower cost than anyone else at that time.

westernrvparkow
Explorer
Explorer
Ralph Cramden wrote:
westernrvparkowner wrote:
John & Angela wrote:
westernrvparkowner wrote:
I disagree wholeheartedly with the signage idea. It is impossible to sign every possibility of misuse of the park. There is another thread running where someone's kids spraypainted trees and picnic tables. Is a sign needed for that as well? If you want to use the park facilities for anything other than what they were intended for, ASK. (And be willing to accept the answer)


Yah I suppose at some point signage can be overdone. Common sense and manners should rule but, you know, thereโ€™s always one....

As an RV park owner you are certainly better equipped to answer this question. Have you had to deal with this yet? If so how did it go? Good to have a campground owner on here discussing it. Any plans for a couple level two stations? This could make it a bit more of a cash flow item...eventually. :). Not a lot out there yet but a couple thousand more every day.
Not interested at all in charging EVs. Don't want to do it for fun or profit.


I suspect you never had the urge to build a gas station or Quickie Mart in the middle of your park either. How about a drive through automatic car wash?
Or a body shop, a rental car agency, an oil change franchise, a restaurant, a beauty parlor, a museum, a zoo or any of the million other things that might interest a recreational vehicle owner. If someone has bought a vehicle that is less than convenient to refuel, that is their problem, not mine.

maillemaker
Explorer
Explorer
EV owners should not get free or below-market cost electricty for their vehicles. If so, the rest of us our paying for it for them. That's not right.


No one has suggested that anyone should get free or below-market cost of electricity for any purpose.

Charging an EV vehicle costs about half per mile what gasoline costs at $.12/kWh for electricity and $2.50/gallon for gasoline.

So again, I see no reason why we should artificially raise the cost of electricity to be on par with gasoline.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/constancedouris/2017/10/24/the-bottom-line-on-electric-cars-theyre-cheaper-to-own/#70bbd6b10b65
1990 Winnebago Warrior. "She may not look like much but she's got it where it counts!"

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
Subsidies are incredibly expensive because government insists on hiring nine hundred percent more employees than necessary to monitor them. Add the time and expense for a company to fill out tons of paperwork and guess who pays for stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with the cost of producing electricity?

The PRIME DIRECTIVE of a government agency is to make it's existence ESSENTIAL and to obtain funding to allow it to GROW.

I hate to say this but some of you desperately need to take a course in economics and learn how the world actually works.

Think of government like this:

A charity where as much as 95% of the donations are applied against administrative costs.

pnichols
Explorer II
Explorer II
maillemaker wrote:
The eventual goal across the country being one of having the EV owner's cost per mile for their use of electricity in the ballpark with the cost per mile to power a fossil fuel vehicle of approximately the same weight or some other criteria.


If electricity is cheaper than fossil fuels, why artificially make it more expensive?

Now absolutely taxes are going to have to be re-figured for EVs, probably based on mileage, since roads are about half-paid for with gasoline taxes.

But there is no reason to artificially inflate the cost of electricity. The whole point is to go to lower-cost solutions.


Renewable energy sourcing of our stick-house electricity can be provided - if we choose it - by our power company. BUT ... they want to charge MORE for it than getting it from their other regular sources for our home's electrictiy. Go figure!

EV owners should not get free or below-market cost electricty for their vehicles. If so, the rest of us are paying for it for them. That's not right.
2005 E450 Itasca 24V Class C

doc_brown
Explorer
Explorer
Experienced that once in 14 years. Back in 2005 we were on Cape Cod and we wanted 50 amps so they gave us a cheater.
Steve,Kathy and Josh
Morpheus(Basenji)at Rainbow Bridge
2004 40' TSDP Country Coach Inspire DaVinci
350 Cummins, 3000 Allison
2014 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport S, Air Force One Braking, Blue Ox

Dusty_R
Explorer
Explorer
I have zero experience with EVs, that being said, I would think that charging their batteries would take some time, much more time than filling a gas tank on other vehicles. that being said, I would think that coffee shops and restaurants would be a likely places to have charging stations.

Dusty

maillemaker
Explorer
Explorer
The eventual goal across the country being one of having the EV owner's cost per mile for their use of electricity in the ballpark with the cost per mile to power a fossil fuel vehicle of approximately the same weight or some other criteria.


If electricity is cheaper than fossil fuels, why artificially make it more expensive?

Now absolutely taxes are going to have to be re-figured for EVs, probably based on mileage, since roads are about half-paid for with gasoline taxes.

But there is no reason to artificially inflate the cost of electricity. The whole point is to go to lower-cost solutions.
1990 Winnebago Warrior. "She may not look like much but she's got it where it counts!"

Ralph_Cramden
Explorer II
Explorer II
westernrvparkowner wrote:
John & Angela wrote:
westernrvparkowner wrote:
I disagree wholeheartedly with the signage idea. It is impossible to sign every possibility of misuse of the park. There is another thread running where someone's kids spraypainted trees and picnic tables. Is a sign needed for that as well? If you want to use the park facilities for anything other than what they were intended for, ASK. (And be willing to accept the answer)


Yah I suppose at some point signage can be overdone. Common sense and manners should rule but, you know, thereโ€™s always one....

As an RV park owner you are certainly better equipped to answer this question. Have you had to deal with this yet? If so how did it go? Good to have a campground owner on here discussing it. Any plans for a couple level two stations? This could make it a bit more of a cash flow item...eventually. :). Not a lot out there yet but a couple thousand more every day.
Not interested at all in charging EVs. Don't want to do it for fun or profit.


I suspect you never had the urge to build a gas station or Quickie Mart in the middle of your park either. How about a drive through automatic car wash?
Too many geezers, self appointed moderators, experts, and disappearing posts for me. Enjoy. How many times can the same thing be rehashed over and over?