cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Opinion Please on These AGMs for an RV

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Somebody Up-Island is selling these type of batteries:

http://www.eastpennmanufacturing.com/wp-content/uploads/Unigy-I-IO-Manual-0902.pdf

EDIT---What do they mean by saying the Float voltage is 13.5 times the number of batteries in the "string" ?????

His ad is here:

https://victoria.craigslist.ca/rvs/d/solar-rv-batteries/6324080059.html

Seems like a good deal, if they are actually any use for RVing, despite their somewhat awkward size, but what do you guys who know about different sorts of AGMs think?

Thanks.

I have not been in touch with the seller. I just saw this ad today. (I am not a regular viewer of Craigslist.)
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.
18 REPLIES 18

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Good info and advice all round, thanks! It's a good thing that place is a two- hour drive away and another two back, or I'd be there sorely tempted.

I might still be going up there after more figuring where I stand with my existing batteries looking ahead (the Wet ones are still good, but not for much longer-another year or two), but at least now I know what's what. Thanks again.
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

Almot
Explorer III
Explorer III
MrWizard wrote:
'stationary' .. I think that is for the fact they are designed to be rack mounted

This had crossed my mind too. Skinny footprint.

Also, - location of terminals. The manual shows 2 types, one has terminals on top. Another one is "top front" where the "top" is covered with plastic cap but I don't see terminals on "front".
OTH, the Craigs photo shows top (covered) and front that is NOT covered, so this might need some special arrangements.

pianotuna
Nomad III
Nomad III
Hi Phil,

These are a special subset of AGM. It is best to treat them as if they were flooded (following correct charging voltages). The other difference is they do not respond well to super high loads, such as engine starting.

Because the chemistry causes them to need slight higher voltage for charging, I get almost NO recharging while driving. In fact, they tend to discharge. (3 or 4 amps) to the chassis. I did try to solve that by putting an AGM starter battery in place, but it did not solve the issue.

pnichols wrote:


John, as you know ... AGM batteries have lower internal resistance than flooded batteries. One can see this right in their specifications.

This lower resistance means - per basic electrical principals - that they will accept a higher charging current at any applied charging voltage.

That is important for part-time drycampers who want to stay with their stock onboard fixed voltage converters - plus short drives between dry camping spots - for charging of their coach batteries. We elected to stay with our stock converter and go with more-$$ AGM batteries, as opposed to paying more-$$ to retrofit with a multi-stage charger and staying with less-$$ flooded batteries. This combination has worked out well for us over the past 11 years with respect to our camping style.

I guess we could have done both to optimize - spend the $$ to retrofit with a boost voltage charger plus spend the $$ to switch to AGM batteries - but the dollar value would have not been worth it to us to do both of these things.
Regards, Don
My ride is a 28 foot Class C, 256 watts solar, 556 amp-hours of Telcom jars, 3000 watt Magnum hybrid inverter, Sola Basic Autoformer, Microair Easy Start.

MrWizard
Moderator
Moderator
'stationary' .. I think that is for the fact they are designed to be rack mounted
the foot print is not a vehicle designed format

internal construction should be just as rugged as all other TelCom batteries

that 12.9v on the meter looks good
grab (4) that read the same voltage
do a load check, pay the man take them home, do a recharge

seriously if I was shopping batteries, and they checked out, i would get several and have NO Qualms about using them

i say (4) instead of (2), because it makes that big inverter draw easier on the batteries, lessens the 'Perkuit" effect


i did 50-90 with my first set of AGM, they lasted 5yrs full time off grid use,( that could give 20yrs partial use ?

on this set i'm doing more full recharge almost every day, at least during a/c weather
so far in over one year of use , IIRC they have not been below 68%
most of the time morning LOW is about 80%, depends on how late i stay up, and if we need the fans overnight
I can explain it to you.
But I Can Not understand it for you !

....

Connected using T-Mobile Home internet and Visible Phone service
1997 F53 Bounder 36s

Almot
Explorer III
Explorer III
BFL13 wrote:
My reason for AGMs over Wets is where I have to mount them inside, where the fumes from Wet cell batts is unacceptable.

There you go. One big reason that people sometimes forget to mention. Was my reason, too (also, very long storage without maintenance charge).

Float voltage times the number of batteries in string? What, didn't have your coffee yet? :)... They explain to unknown but apparently large percentage of dummies in the customers base that volts are added in series. Though I didn't read the rest of the manual.

pnichols
Explorer II
Explorer II
wa8yxm wrote:
However I have found NO advantage of AGM over flooded wet cells with the exception of the absence of a "This side up" label (AGM's can be mounted in most any position you choose).


John, as you know ... AGM batteries have lower internal resistance than flooded batteries. One can see this right in their specifications.

This lower resistance means - per basic electrical principles - that they will accept a higher charging current at any applied charging voltage.

That is important for part-time drycampers who want to stay with their stock onboard fixed voltage converters - plus short drives between dry camping spots - for charging of their coach batteries. We elected to stay with our stock converter and go with more-$$ AGM batteries, as opposed to paying more-$$ to retrofit with a multi-stage charger and staying with less-$$ flooded batteries. This combination has worked out well for us over the past 11 years with respect to our camping style.

I guess we could have done both to optimize - spend the $$ to retrofit with a boost voltage charger plus spend the $$ to switch to AGM batteries - but the dollar value would have not been worth it to us to do both of these things.
2005 E450 Itasca 24V Class C

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
SoundGuy wrote:
BFL13 wrote:
Any more ideas?


No battery is worth anything unless you have the proper means to recharge it. Seems Deka has some pretty specific requirements for these jugs.


I have PowerMax adjustable voltage chargers. I can recharge any 12v to any specs. ๐Ÿ™‚

If the AGMs were in a "string" then I would have to do one at a time or rewire to parallel for the recharge, then put them back in series.

I would only be using them in parallel anyway. I am not going up in voltage like some guys here have done. No reason to in my case, but there is nothing wrong with doing that if you need to.
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
My reason for AGMs over Wets is where I have to mount them inside, where the fumes from Wet cell batts is unacceptable. I do know there is still a risk of venting from a big overcharge, so I don't do that.

The AGMs I have now suit my 50-90s etc. I am not so sure about the telecom type. I can maybe see them for when on solar doing say 75-99s but not so much for sustained 50-90s. Just don't know, which is why am asking. Mr Wiz and PT seem to be doing ok, but might have different AGMs from the OP type. Not too clear!

The Golf Car shop up-Island I got my used T-1275s at is near this place that has the funny AGMs. For the same price, I would get used T-1275s again most likely. Don't know enough about it--yet ๐Ÿ™‚
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

time2roll
Nomad
Nomad
I am sure they are fine and are from a good manufacturer.

You want a 'deal' and a project I say go for it. Offer $50/ea and take them all.

wa8yxm
Explorer III
Explorer III
I'm not sure about the "Ruggedness" of them physically and thus will not comment.

However I have found NO advantage of AGM over flooded wet cells with the exception of the absence of a "This side up" label (AGM's can be mounted in most any position you choose).

No advantage in terms of capacity
No advantage in terms of longer overall life
No cost savings less you get 'em at a fire sale
MAJOR cost increase over flooded wet

This is why I support GC-2 Pairs as the battery of choice.. Best bang for the buck.
Home was where I park it. but alas the.
2005 Damon Intruder 377 Alas declared a total loss
after a semi "nicked" it. Still have the radios
Kenwood TS-2000, ICOM ID-5100, ID-51A+2, ID-880 REF030C most times

Kayteg1
Explorer II
Explorer II
AGM batteries were developed for military harsh driving and condition.
They have very little purpose in normal vehicles to begin, but howcome they become stationary batteries?

BFL13
Explorer II
Explorer II
Good info, thanks all. So how would they take deep cycling, doing 50-90s a few times in a row before being recharged fully?

And how would two in parallel (staying with 12v system) take supplying an inverter pulling say 100 amps for 10 minutes? My two deep cycle AGMs I have now are fine with that, but they are not telecom type AGMs like these.

I got the "string" figured out--that means in series, so you do add their voltages.
1. 1991 Oakland 28DB Class C
on Ford E350-460-7.5 Gas EFI
Photo in Profile
2. 1991 Bighorn 9.5ft Truck Camper on 2003 Chev 2500HD 6.0 Gas
See Profile for Electronic set-ups for 1. and 2.

Ivylog
Explorer III
Explorer III
BluegrassBill wrote:
The first word in instructions is "Stationary" I doubt these could stand the bouncing in a motorhome or trailer.

AGMs can handle vibrations/bouncing around better than most batteries...no liquid. Even though they are 5 years old, assuming they were standby power they have very few cycle, BUT in a solar system they could have reached their useful life. In series means they were in 24/36/48 V system, not a 12V system. If I was close by like you and could make the size fit I'd buy them. I would check the voltage carefully and buy ones with the same resting voltage.
These are not engine starting batteries so CCA will be very low and you should not use them for starting.
This post is my opinion (free advice). It is not intended to influence anyone's judgment nor do I advocate anyone do what I propose.
Sold 04 Dynasty to our son after 14 great years.
Upgraded with a 08 HR Navigator 45โ€™...

MEXICOWANDERER
Explorer
Explorer
It looks like a Quebecois wrote the manual. Lots of stuff missing. Ampere hour 20 - 5 - 1 hour rates. Glass mat batteries are by nature much stronger in their plate support regime. The grids are massive.

These are telecomm UPS batteries and should be treated the same as others of their class. See if you can score more specs from Deka including s cycle life chart.

If new they will outlast you and your pet tortoise. But they are not a high CCA battery so plan on around 400 CCA each.