โDec-13-2017 06:59 PM
โDec-23-2017 06:25 AM
justme wrote:Cummins12V98 wrote:justme wrote:
Last summer I got 12.1mpg average from San Francisco to Connecticut on my 2012 F350 diesel pulling a 40ft trailer. I set my cruise control to 62mph most of the time. I got 12.2 mpg from Connecticut to Florida recently. I use ctane additive/booster all the time and never use B20.....
Using display or hand calc? What is your combined weight and is your RV a wide body? Most people never use B20 since the tag says "up to B20".
I'm using the display after I determined that it is accurate and my combined wieght is 24260 according to the CAT scale. Also it is not a wide body. Ford says B20 is OK and does not say up to B20. However they recommend ether 5-40 synthetic or 15-40 non synthetic with B20 which is the same recommendation for severe duty. B20 burns hotter and does not have the BTU content that diesel #2 has which means translates to lower efficiency and less MPG. Also B20 is harder on the high pressure fuel pumps and injectors on the newer trucks.
โDec-22-2017 08:35 PM
โDec-22-2017 08:41 AM
Cummins12V98 wrote:justme wrote:
Last summer I got 12.1mpg average from San Francisco to Connecticut on my 2012 F350 diesel pulling a 40ft trailer. I set my cruise control to 62mph most of the time. I got 12.2 mpg from Connecticut to Florida recently. I use ctane additive/booster all the time and never use B20.....
Using display or hand calc? What is your combined weight and is your RV a wide body? Most people never use B20 since the tag says "up to B20".
โDec-22-2017 06:54 AM
โDec-22-2017 06:47 AM
justme wrote:
Last summer I got 12.1mpg average from San Francisco to Connecticut on my 2012 F350 diesel pulling a 40ft trailer. I set my cruise control to 62mph most of the time. I got 12.2 mpg from Connecticut to Florida recently. I use ctane additive/booster all the time and never use B20.....
โDec-22-2017 05:58 AM
โDec-21-2017 08:18 PM
โDec-21-2017 07:49 PM
fj12ryder wrote:Been doing some recent figure's on fuel I used this summer, computer showed 16.3L per 100k and since we live in CanadaJohnny G1 wrote:17 mpg might be easy to take, but 16L per 100K equals 14.7 mpg. Still a bit high, but more believable than 17 mpg. ๐
A recent trip to the Arctic Circle this past summer, 28' Travelaire loaded and I average 16L per 100K 8000K or 5000 miles mind you the dodge is pumped up a bit so 17 mpg was easy to take.
โDec-21-2017 03:26 PM
โDec-20-2017 05:52 PM
โDec-20-2017 11:35 AM
Johnny G1 wrote:17 mpg might be easy to take, but 16L per 100K equals 14.7 mpg. Still a bit high, but more believable than 17 mpg. ๐
A recent trip to the Arctic Circle this past summer, 28' Travelaire loaded and I average 16L per 100K 8000K or 5000 miles mind you the dodge is pumped up a bit so 17 mpg was easy to take.
โDec-20-2017 09:50 AM
โDec-20-2017 05:30 AM
43tutor wrote:
For what it is worth, my truck (1996 F250, 7.3L diesel, 4.10 rearend, manual transmission) was getting around 10 mpg towing. This spring I made a few upgrades. All new 4" exhaust, eliminated exhaust particle filter on exhaust, removed exhaust back pressure valve, added a TS performance 6 position chip, and rebuilt the turbo (stock configuration). Now the truck consistently gets 12 to 12.3 mpg towing at 65 mph (11,000 lb 5'er) with the chip set on 50+ HP. Daily driving to work (250 miles per week) the truck went from 18 mpg up to 22.5 mpg (mostly interstate driving at 65 mph). I've tested different positions on tuner chip and it seems like 50+ HP is the sweet spot best mpg. I can dial up to 140+ HP with this chip for hill climbs if needed but so far 50+ is enough. Exhaust gas temperatures with the chip set at 50+ HP keeps the 7.3L in the safe zone.
โDec-19-2017 05:09 PM
โDec-18-2017 04:39 PM
Cummins12V98 wrote:racer4 wrote:
10.5-12 mpg at 62 mph with 20,000 miles on the odometer.
I question this also!