cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

2014 coachman freelander

Ohiophil
Explorer
Explorer
The wife and I are looking at a 28โ€™ DS Chevy with 20,000 miles very clean this would be our first RV and first experience of camping going to use it to travel and haul a motorcycle in the trailer they are asking $43900 I think thatโ€™s a little high any advice would be appreciated retiring in 2 years
12 REPLIES 12

Gjac
Explorer III
Explorer III
Desert Captain wrote:
"I like that size MH and layout you have. Does the rear storage bay go under the bed to the other side? I notice the new ones don't have that large door in the rear. Also you said the Chevy had less power than the Ford I thought the Chevy had 323 HP and the Ford 305? In your size MH is the CCC better in the Ford? "


The rear storage bay goes under the rear queen, about 6' deep but not out to the other side. As I recall the Chevy has less torque not certain on the HP assuming we are talking their 6 liter V-8.
My E-350 has over 3k# of payload/CCC and I use most of it as I carry lots of tools, toys, have tongue weight when towing the cargo trailer, etc. As noted I have absolutely no use for auto levelers either which saves a lot of weight and headaches.

When we were shopping the floorplan was paramount as I was {and still am} dead set against slides which = a lot less weight and aggravation. Our coach is probably one of the roomiest {non slide} Class C's under 25' as it is 101" wide and has a full 7' of headroom throughout the coach.

We don't have grandkids and no longer have the pooch so it is just my bride and I. At 5' 1" and 5' 9" we are not large folks and Ford fits us perfectly. I love the power driver's seat which is so comfortable that even long days are easily done. Having been boaters for nearly 40 years we are of the minimalist persuasion. We have had the Nexus for nearly 6 years and 50K trouble free miles and are looking forward to many more.

:C
Thanks for the report a lot of helpful information. I have been looking at smaller MH's, started looking at TC's but quickly learned that you need a very large DRW truck if you wanted a camper with some room, a 450 truck(which most says you need) alone costs more than a small Class C which has more room more storage and generally more CCC.

Desert_Captain
Explorer III
Explorer III
"I like that size MH and layout you have. Does the rear storage bay go under the bed to the other side? I notice the new ones don't have that large door in the rear. Also you said the Chevy had less power than the Ford I thought the Chevy had 323 HP and the Ford 305? In your size MH is the CCC better in the Ford? "


The rear storage bay goes under the rear queen, about 6' deep but not out to the other side. As I recall the Chevy has less torque not certain on the HP assuming we are talking their 6 liter V-8.
My E-350 has over 3k# of payload/CCC and I use most of it as I carry lots of tools, toys, have tongue weight when towing the cargo trailer, etc. As noted I have absolutely no use for auto levelers either which saves a lot of weight and headaches.

When we were shopping the floorplan was paramount as I was {and still am} dead set against slides which = a lot less weight and aggravation. Our coach is probably one of the roomiest {non slide} Class C's under 25' as it is 101" wide and has a full 7' of headroom throughout the coach.

We don't have grandkids and no longer have the pooch so it is just my bride and I. At 5' 1" and 5' 9" we are not large folks and Ford fits us perfectly. I love the power driver's seat which is so comfortable that even long days are easily done. Having been boaters for nearly 40 years we are of the minimalist persuasion. We have had the Nexus for nearly 6 years and 50K trouble free miles and are looking forward to many more.

:C

Gjac
Explorer III
Explorer III
Desert Captain wrote:
Ohiophil, the mileage/age of both sounds about right. Hopefully they both come with full-service records to document their maintenance {Muy importante!}. The most important thing is to find a floor plan that you like as there is no changing that.

As far as the old Ford/Chevy debate if you are over 6' tall or the first number when you get on the scale is larger than one then the Chevy will be a little bit more comfortable {for the driver}. The Chevy will have less power but not much, ride and handling will be comparable, and either rig will tow your Harley just fine

I recommend a cargo trailer, mine is 6' X 10' {14' overall}, and it obviously protects the bike from weather, dirt and bad guys very well. It its so nice to have your own personal garage everywhere you go and it will also provide a lot of additional storage. Mine has 7' of headroom and since you are towing behind a large box there is no reason not to to seek the same. Loading/unloading is so easy not to mention safe.

Both of the rigs you are considering will be woefully short of payload and you should compare apples to apples in this regard. The larger the Class C the less payload you will have. Auto levelers will shorten up your payload by a couple of hundred pounds, are typically problematic and frankly not needed. Yellow Leggo blocks work just fine but some folks feel they just "have" to have them.

Check both rigs for any sign of water leaks especially around the cab/cabover connection and if you find any evidence of water intrusion... Run Forrest run!"

Here are a couple of shots of my rig {2012 Nexus Phantom 23P - 24.5'} and the cargo trailer:





:C
I like that size MH and layout you have. Does the rear storage bay go under the bed to the other side? I notice the new ones don't have that large door in the rear. Also you said the Chevy had less power than the Ford I thought the Chevy had 323 HP and the Ford 305? In your size MH is the CCC better in the Ford?

I-Can-Am-Can-Yo
Explorer
Explorer
Yes, my freelander is on a Chevy chassis. I prefer the attributes of the Chevy chassis. Iโ€™m not a brand evangelist by any means, but I really disliked the ford cab.

Ohiophil
Explorer
Explorer
Thanks

ron_dittmer
Explorer II
Explorer II
Hi Phil from Ohio,

This is a very long "read" but I think you will find it interesting and applicable to the rigs you are considering.

Ron Dittmer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New, used, or well used, when shopping for a conventional class B+ or C, the most important consideration is how it is constructed. This post outlines construction methods which are most affordable and methods that cost more, but are built to hold up much better to the elements and also the punishment of the road.

Some motor home manufactures offer different levels of quality through their various model lines. Instead of providing a list of brands to consider, it is best to identify what "Better" is.

When shopping for a motor home, don't get distracted with "Eye Candy" and "Square Footage". You want to pay close attention to how the house is constructed. Water infiltration is the number one killer of motor homes, rotting them away long before anything is worn out. Once water gets inside, it is like termites. By the time you realize there is a problem, a lot of damage has already occurred. Also consider that mold & mildew can grow inside the walls which then you have a health hazard. My advise focuses on identifying a reliably well sealed motor home.

#1 BEST (Very Expensive, Can Be 1.5 times the cost of Second Best)
NO structural seam work. The brand Coach House is a fine example. It is seamless, made from a mold. The only places where water can leak is cutouts for windows, entry door, roof-top vents & a/c unit, storage compartments & maintenance access, all of which are in areas of very low stress. Because they have a seamless shell, these motor homes are not common and have a limited selection of sizes and floor plans.

#2 SECOND BEST
Common, Affordable, & comes in Many Sizes so this is my main focus
I own an example of this type. My Rig Here manufactured by Phoenix USA.
Made in sections, but assembled in a way that greatly reduces the threat of water damage. Here are the good things you want to look for.

a) Structural Seams Away From Corners
When a motor home is driven, the house bounces, resonates, shakes, and leans countless times, representing a endless series of earthquakes. Corner seams see greater stresses than seams located elsewhere. Corner seams are more easily split, especially when the caulk gets brittle with age & exposure to the sun. One extremely bad bump in the road can instantly breach a corner seam. Seams hold up much better when they are brought in from the corners in lesser stressed areas.

b) A Seamless Over-The-Van Front Cap
A huge bed above the vanโ€™s roof is the most vulnerable area of a motor home. No matter how well they are made, that long frontal over-hang resonates when the RV is driven making it common for seams to split there, most troublesome with age & exposure to the elements. HERE is an example, one of many water-damage threads I have read. Scroll down in that thread to see pictures of the real damage.

The small front aerodynamic cap of a B+ design HERE eliminates the overhang which eliminates most of the resonation, along with the most vulnerable seam work.

There are a few conventional โ€œCโ€ Designs (big over-van bed) where that area is seamless. If you absolutely must have that huge bed, then look for a seamless bucket-like design. The Itasca Navion Here is a fine example. Some manufactures as of late offer a partial bucket design with fewer seams located in less-stressed areas. Some manufacture models like the Minnie Winnie and the Nexus Phantom utilize a compromising partial bucket design, making it a better choice compared to a fully seamed cab-over bed.

If you plan to accommodate more than 2 people, having that large extra cab-over bed will be extremely useful.

c) A Crowned Roof
Rain and snow melt runs off a crowned roof. A flat roof will sag over time, then water puddles around heavy roof-top items like the a/c unit. Water eventually finds it's way inside after gaskets & caulk have degraded from age, sun, and change in seasons.

d) Rolled-Over-The-Edge seamless Fiberglass Roof Sheathing
A single sheet of fiberglass as shown HERE that rolls over the right & left sides of the roof, down to the wall. The overlapping of fiberglass to the wall provides a good water seal and the fiberglass sheathing holds up better than roofs made of sheet rubber or thin plastic called TPO, which require more attention to keep your RV well protected.

e) A Five Sided Rear Wall Cap
A five sided back wall moves the seams around to the sides to areas of much less stress as seen HERE. The rear wall resembles a shallow rectangular cooking pan standing on it's side. Like the example, some rear wall sections are constructed with an integrated spare tire compartment and rear storage compartment. Not only are they convenience features, but that rear wall/cap offers a solid double-wall for exceptional strength which is more resistant to flexing the adjoining seam work. It helps in keeping the house together.

Don't be fooled. There are a select few manufactures who add rear wall sectional styling pieces over an entry level rear corner seam design which gives the appearance of a 5-sided pan design. You can easily tell by noting the sections & seams between them and the flat back wall that remains exposed.

Bigger Will Be Weaker
The size & floor plan you select MUST FIRST meet your needs before this consideration.
The bigger the house, the weaker the structure will be. Consider two cardboard boxes made from the exact same corrugated material. The smaller box would naturally be stronger. It will be more resistant to bending, twisting, and other types of flexing. So if you are on the fence between models, the smaller one will be your stronger choice.

Potentially Troublesome Construction
Entry level motor homes are made with seams in corners and finished off with trim, including the massive cab-over bed. Their roof is flat and finished with rubber or TPO. They are most affordable, and come in all sizes. HERE is one such example. If considering this construction type, keep in-mind they require more regular care with bi-annual inspections. Plan to use a caulking gun now and then. When buying a used one, consider that you really don't know how well the previous owner maintained it. Buying new or used, that construction method will be counting on you to be a good non-neglectful owner.

There are also the rare exception of the Lazy Daze which has seam work in the corners, but the substructure and sealing method is of the highest quality that it holds up like a seamless body. It's excellent sectional construction methods are not commonly found in other brands. I am no expert on this, but I'd give it a #1.5 Almost Like Best

About The Chassis
The most popular is the Ford E350 and E450 with the V10 engine. The Sprinter diesel is a popular alternative to the E350 in the smaller sizes. Also within this past year is the recent introduction of the Ford Transit. The GM 3500 & 4500 chassis are not popular but are a very good choice for the right application. Any of the chassis mentioned made since 1998 are real good, new or used. If you plan to tow a car or heavy trailer, be aware that the Sprinter & Transit will be least powered. People who tow with them naturally take it slower.

If considering a current-day โ€œsmallโ€ class B+ or C motor home, here is a comparison between the two current main chassis contenders, the Sprinter with the V6 diesel engine and the Ford E350 with the V10 gasoline engine.

Advantages Of The Mercedes Sprinter With Diesel Engine
- Offers a 35%-50% improvement in fuel economy over the Ford-V10, when both are loaded and driven identically.
- More ergonomic driver compartment with more leg room.
- Comfort continues with a car-like feel & quiet ride.
- A grander view out the windshield
- Made by Mercedes which people are attracted to.

Advantages Of The Ford E350 with V10 Engine
- Given identical motor homes both brand and model, the Ford is around $24,000 MSRP cheaper
- The Ford V10 engine has 50% more horse power and torque
- The Ford E350 chassis handles 1430 pounds more weight.
- The E350 is able to tow a heavier load.
- The E350 rear axle is significantly wider which translates to better stability.
- In most places traveled, gasoline costs less than diesel fuel
- The Sprinter diesel has limited mechanical service shops around North America
- The Sprinter diesel is typically outfitted with a propane generator. Propane is a critical fuel for RV operations, and generally needs to be rationed when dry camping.
- This Next Point Is Debatable But Still Worth Noting....The V6 Sprinter diesel engine is not allowed to idle for extended periods. This limitation is detrimental when you need a/c but there are generator restrictions, you are low on propane, or you have a mechanical failure with the generator or roof a/c. The Ford offers a great backup system. The V10 can safely idle for hours on end, heating, cooling, and battery charging, all valuable if you have a baby, pets, or health/respiratory issues.

You decide what your priorities are, and pick the appropriate chassis. There are some really sweet motor homes being built exclusively on the Sprinter chassis, such as the Winnebago Navion and View. A few manufactures like Phoenix USA offer their model 2350 and 2400 on both the Sprinter and Ford E-Series. You can even special order a Phoenix Cruiser E-Series 4x4.

There is so much cool stuff offered in recent years on the Sprinter and most recently on the new Ford Transit.

The Ford Transit Chassis
This chassis has the potential to dominate the class B+ & C motor home market in the smaller sizes. According to Ford's website, the Transit DRW chassis is offered in the 156", and 178" wheel base, and is rated as high as 10,360 GVWR. Ford offers a motor home package specific for the RV industry. It's diesel engine compares to the Sprinter in power and fuel economy, but is more affordable and is easily serviced at Ford service centers, just like the E350 & E450. The cab has a much lower stance than the Sprinter making it much more friendly to get into and out from for people in their later years. It's more like a mini-van rather than a standard van. The Transit's lower cab also offers roomier over-head bunks that are easier to access.

The Dodge Promaster 3500 Cut-Away Chassis
This front wheel drive chassis is another recent entry in the RV industry. I am concerned over it's lack of load capability as reflected with single free-wheeling rear wheels. I have been reading posts written by new Promaster RV owners stating they are over-weight with just two people, some personal effects and food. They say they can't carry water and never a 3rd person. I would not be comfortable with such a limited load range in a B+ or C. This chassis does seem to be a good option in the "B" motor home market.

The Chevy 3500 & 4500 Chassis
Unfortunately this chassis is not more popular, primarily because GM sort-of gave up on competing with the Ford E350 & E450. It offers more interior comfort than the Ford, but not as much as the Sprinter. It's power & weight ratings are a little less than their Ford counter-parts making them a great chassis for all but the heaviest of class Cs. They are also a little better on fuel consumption. One thing to keep in-mind, if you are counting inches in storing your rig, the Chevy is a little longer than the Ford by a number of inches which was critical for us with our garage as seen HERE with our Ford 2007 E350 rig. That could be the reason why the Chevy has a little more interior driver/passenger leg room.

The Ford E350 & E450
The majority of class B+ and C motor homes are built on one of these two chassis for a number of very good reasons. They have more power and load capability than the others. Ford approves outfitters to modify the chassis to increase or decrease the wheel base which supplies motor home companies a lot of design freedom. Ford has off-the-shelf components that work with the wheel base modification. So if you need a new drive shaft, fuel line, brake line, parking brake cable, wire harness, whatever, Ford has them available. Finally, the E350 and E450 chassis is competitively priced.

Engine Power Ratings of Ford, MB-Sprinter, Chevy, and Dodge
Ford E350 & E450 - 6.8L-V10, 305hp, 420ft
Ford Transit Diesel - 3.2L-I5, 185hp, 350ft
Mercedes Sprinter Diesel - 3.0L-V6, 188hp, 325ft
Chevy 3500 & 4500 - 6.0L-V8, 323hp, 373ft
Dodge Promaster - 3.6L-V6 (GVW only 9,300 pounds)

Now to supply some data as to why I feel our Phoenix Cruiser stands above most other brands. These two videos drag on, but provide lots of data and also clarify critical things to look for when evaluating any brand.

CLICK HERE on a comparison between a Phoenix Cruiser and an unknown brand.

CLICK HERE for a slideshow on how a Phoenix Cruiser is built. I feel this slide show teaches so much, especially about hidden things to consider.

Desert_Captain
Explorer III
Explorer III
Ohiophil, the mileage/age of both sounds about right. Hopefully they both come with full-service records to document their maintenance {Muy importante!}. The most important thing is to find a floor plan that you like as there is no changing that.

As far as the old Ford/Chevy debate if you are over 6' tall or the first number when you get on the scale is larger than one then the Chevy will be a little bit more comfortable {for the driver}. The Chevy will have less power but not much, ride and handling will be comparable, and either rig will tow your Harley just fine

I recommend a cargo trailer, mine is 6' X 10' {14' overall}, and it obviously protects the bike from weather, dirt and bad guys very well. It its so nice to have your own personal garage everywhere you go and it will also provide a lot of additional storage. Mine has 7' of headroom and since you are towing behind a large box there is no reason not to to seek the same. Loading/unloading is so easy not to mention safe.

Both of the rigs you are considering will be woefully short of payload and you should compare apples to apples in this regard. The larger the Class C the less payload you will have. Auto levelers will shorten up your payload by a couple of hundred pounds, are typically problematic and frankly not needed. Yellow Leggo blocks work just fine but some folks feel they just "have" to have them.

Check both rigs for any sign of water leaks especially around the cab/cabover connection and if you find any evidence of water intrusion... Run Forrest run!"

Here are a couple of shots of my rig {2012 Nexus Phantom 23P - 24.5'} and the cargo trailer:





:C

IAMICHABOD
Explorer II
Explorer II
Although it is an entry level and in great shape one clear advantage is that it on
Chevy Chassis

It will give you a larger drivers area,smoother,quietier ride among a lot of other advantages. I really like my RV on a Chevy Chassis,it also gets just a bit more MPG than the same one on a Ford Chassis and a larger fuel tank,by 2 gallons ...:B
2006 TIOGA 26Q CHEVY 6.0 WORKHORSE VORTEC
Former El Monte RV Rental
Retired Teamster Local 692
Buying A Rental Class C

Ohiophil
Explorer
Explorer
Thank you I was not aware it was an entry level unit I know the cabinetry and interior is very nice, is your freelander on a Chevrolet chassis ?

I-Can-Am-Can-Yo
Explorer
Explorer
I have a 15 freelander. Understand that freelanders are entry-level units and their construction reflects that. The cabover and roof construction is outmoded and requires continuous resealing. Given this, they require far more attention to maintenance than more expensive models with solid cabover caps and better build quality. Entry level was good enough for what we use ours for so we factored that into our decision to buy, and the lower price point let us have more unit for our money. I canโ€™t comment on the price, just be sure youโ€™re making an apples to apples comparison as you shop. Good luck!

Ohiophil
Explorer
Explorer
Ok itโ€™s a 2014 coachman freelander with 20,000 miles 28DS very clean ?? thatโ€™s a 4500 Chevy chassis itโ€™s at a RV dealer in Alliance Ohio small dealer mainly sell trailers travel that is and service very good people to talk to I have not driven it yet just started looking couple months ago was up in the air whether I wanted to pull one or drive one, they also have a 2011 E450 Ford chassis Chateau 31, with 25,000 miles it was clean maybe not quite as clean as the coachman but it was clean I did like the 28 DS layout better he was really trying to push the Ford and had hydraulic leveling system also that they had installed, I think it belong to a relative of theirs These units are both on consignment
Thanks
That trailer I would be pulling what have a Harley limited 2016

Desert_Captain
Explorer III
Explorer III
If you provide more info on the coach you will get a better response on the proposed price. Year, mileage, engine/drive train, options, condition, etc would be good. When it comes to hauling a motorcycle in a trailer feel free to PM me as I have been doing it for 3+ years with great results.

Good luck.

:C