401nailhead wrote:
Yes, no offense to anyone, but I wouldn't use Toyota as an example in 2015. I'm not bashing Toyota either, but just speaking about realistic expectations. Toyota had a reputation at one time for that type of top-of-the-line workmanship, but that was partially a backlash against mediocre U.S. products at that time (and needing an automotive hero). I never really ever saw it to the degree people talked about it (envisioned it). And further at that time, if you kept the Toyota long enough, the bubble burst a little later on,as on average people were not so pleased at all about the paint and rust out (usually still pleased about most of the mechanical though).
No offense back at you. But, have you ever actually owned a Toyota? I have owned quite a few of them (and many other marques as well). I can honestly say that the Toyota experience is in a whole higher league than any other brand I have ever owned. My 2005 Sienna with almost 140,000 miles absolutely refuses to give me an excuse to replace it. Last month, I needed to replace a small section of exhaust pipe. This was
literally the first dollars (beyond routine maintenance) I have EVER spent on this vehicle. This is typical of every Toyota-built vehicle I have ever owned. Unless my next car turns out to be a Tesla, I'm not sure I will even bother to shop beyond Toyota models. I sure wish they would start selling their Sprinter-equivalent in the US. Now, THAT would be a B-van!
Back to RVs: I have a lot of respect for Winnebago as the "value" brand. Obviously not top of the line, and, yes, you are giving things up for the sake of price-point. But, IMO, they are the most cost-effective of all the major brands. For someone on a budget, I would recommend them in a heartbeat.