A higher rated alternator sounds great always, but the fact is bigger ratings do not always translate to higher amperages at the RPM they are likely to see.
many examples of that here:
http://www.balmar.net/?page_id=15141Also, the voltage regulator plays a bigger part in battery charging when idling or driving, than the numerical rating of the alternator. While a single battery depleted to 65% state of charge at 14.7v might accept 40 amps, at 13.7v it might only accept 15 amps, so a higher rated alternator will do precisely nothing when the vehicles voltage regulator chooses a 'safe and timid' voltage to aim for, thinking all it has to do is recharge or maintain a fully charged engine starting battery.
Even stepping this up for multiple depleted batteries, there is NO guarantee the 130 amp alternator will outperform a 105 amp alternator. Not when 13.7 is the voltage chosen by the regulator, and not when the amperage curve shows the max rpms are only available at the top end of the rpms where the alternator is likely to not spend any time.
My 120 amp alternator, well it can accomplish that at 2400rpm. My cruising rpms rarely exceed 1900. but I can choose voltage, and have an Ammeter on my dashboard, and can easily see what the alternator is returning to batteries. The voltage chosen plays a HUGE part. I can spin a dial at any rpm and repeat this time and again.
The higher rated alternator should in theory handle the heat it generates better, but theory and reality ore often well opposed from each other, especially if one chooses to test theory with measurement tools and influencing the variables, rather than rely on internet folklore.