โMay-30-2015 04:03 PM
โJun-05-2015 01:37 AM
pnichols wrote:brulaz wrote:
Pretty sobering stuff about AGMs wanting such high charge currents.
Thanks to all for the links and info.
Need to rethink how best to expand the battery bank of our solar-only system.
AGM batteries do not "want" high charge currents.
...
Our RV 's AGM batteries have seen only low charging currents for years because I do not use a high capacity charger on them ... other than just the engine alternator between campsites. Otherwise they only see 5-20 amps charging currents while camping.
โJun-04-2015 07:42 PM
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
Top notch companies with similarly top gifted design engineers are the only valid source of information about their product. Concorde says without stuttering, that low charging potential will adversely affect their product.
โJun-04-2015 03:41 PM
โJun-04-2015 01:51 PM
full_mosey wrote:pianotuna wrote:
...
I know a flooded battery starts to taper at 85% state of charge--12.5 amps per 100 amp-hours. Does anyone know at what voltage AGM's start to taper?
That is an interesting question.
Lifeline specs a 500% inrush limit which seems to say that a 500A charger could be used on a 100AH AGM. At what SOC% would the bulk charge end?
How long does an 80% discharged FLA stay in bulk when charged at the usual 25-33% charge rate. Is that charge rate where the 85% SOC after bulk comes from?
I would like to see a side-by-side charging test where the AGM gets a higher charge rate than the FLA allows.
HTH;
John
โJun-04-2015 01:34 PM
brulaz wrote:
Pretty sobering stuff about AGMs wanting such high charge currents.
Thanks to all for the links and info.
Need to rethink how best to expand the battery bank of our solar-only system.
โJun-04-2015 10:34 AM
โJun-03-2015 04:25 PM
โJun-03-2015 03:53 PM
pianotuna wrote:
...
I know a flooded battery starts to taper at 85% state of charge--12.5 amps per 100 amp-hours. Does anyone know at what voltage AGM's start to taper?
โJun-03-2015 02:10 PM
brulaz wrote:pianotuna wrote:
If you never get below -20 or can avoid charging below -20 (-4 f), then LI are clearly the way to go.brulaz wrote:
Pretty sobering stuff about AGMs wanting such high charge currents.
Thanks to all for the links and info.
Need to rethink how best to expand the battery bank of our solar-only system.
But ouch! Big $$$
โJun-03-2015 01:30 PM
pianotuna wrote:
If you never get below -20 or can avoid charging below -20 (-4 f), then LI are clearly the way to go.brulaz wrote:
Pretty sobering stuff about AGMs wanting such high charge currents.
Thanks to all for the links and info.
Need to rethink how best to expand the battery bank of our solar-only system.
โJun-03-2015 12:56 PM
jrnymn7 wrote:
Hmmm, I wonder how low current charging effects LiFePo?
โJun-03-2015 06:44 AM
โJun-03-2015 06:28 AM
brulaz wrote:
Pretty sobering stuff about AGMs wanting such high charge currents.
Thanks to all for the links and info.
Need to rethink how best to expand the battery bank of our solar-only system.
โJun-02-2015 11:36 PM
โJun-02-2015 04:11 PM