โJul-15-2017 08:29 AM
โJul-23-2017 11:02 PM
jyrostng wrote:
consumer reports was only about pressure loss over time
not pressure changes when hot to cold.
this subject is as about as controversial as Carlos Hathcock's sniper shot!
โJul-23-2017 09:40 PM
The results show nitrogen does reduce pressure
loss over time, but the reduction is only a 1.3 psi difference from air-filled tires. The average loss of air-filled tires was just 3.5 psi from the initial 30 pressure setting. Nitrogen-filled tires lost an average of 2.2 psi from the initial 30 psi setting.
โJul-23-2017 12:09 PM
jyrostng wrote:
Consumer reportsconsumer reports wrote:
The use of nitrogen in large truck fleets and the commercial tire industry are well documented and support these claims.
Aren't RV 19.5 and 22" Exactly the same as Fleet truck tires?
The results show nitrogen does reduce pressure loss over time, but the reduction is only a 1.3 psi difference from air-filled tires. The average loss of air-filled tires was just 3.5 psi from the initial 30 pressure setting. Nitrogen-filled tires lost an average of 2.2 psi from the initial 30 psi setting.
โJul-23-2017 12:06 PM
โJul-23-2017 08:24 AM
โJul-21-2017 04:10 PM
โJul-21-2017 02:30 PM
consumer reports wrote:
The use of nitrogen in large truck fleets and the commercial tire industry are well documented and support these claims.
โJul-21-2017 03:14 AM
โJul-20-2017 10:57 PM
jimduchek wrote:
The biggest advantage to having pure N2 in your tires instead of 'air' is that if you have steel wheels, there can be no internal rusting. And I _have_ had wheels rust enough to cause the bead not to seat properly. Which required some poor kid to spend 2 seconds on them with a grinding wheel -- I don't think I paid extra for that, it was good experience for him anyway ๐
With that said I would never pay extra for it, but if the tire shop offers for free, it's better to say yes. It's not worth more than $0.00 for most of us, but if you've got a numbers-stock '57 Corvette and you want to keep those original wheels for the next 50 years, might be worth a couple bucks to put an inert gas in instead of 20% oxygen, but I can't think of any other case.
โJul-20-2017 10:40 PM
โJul-20-2017 08:51 PM
โJul-20-2017 08:46 PM
โJul-20-2017 05:36 PM
โJul-20-2017 04:05 PM
joebedford wrote:Bill.Satellite wrote:Were you being extremely subtle stating what you think of people who use nitrogen refills, or did you mean "peace"? ๐
Nitrogen might give them some piece of mind
โJul-20-2017 02:46 PM
crcr wrote:A 1.3psi difference over the course of a full 12 months. I'm thinking that may be stretching the term "advantage" quite a bit; "slight" seems to be the relative term.:)
I am indifferent whether anyone fills their tires with nitrogen or not, but FYI, here is what appears to me to be a scientifically done test that shows a slight advantage to using nitrogen. To each his own ...
Consumer Reports Nitrogen-filled tire test
"... The results show nitrogen does reduce pressure loss over time, but the reduction is only a 1.3 psi difference from air-filled tires ..."