โOct-27-2018 11:11 AM
โNov-03-2018 04:33 PM
โNov-03-2018 04:29 PM
โNov-03-2018 09:16 AM
โNov-03-2018 06:23 AM
โNov-03-2018 12:14 AM
โOct-31-2018 08:08 PM
โOct-31-2018 07:07 PM
agesilaus wrote:While I agree 100% in principle, the problem arises when a company hires that dope fiend or drunkard and they promptly injure or kill an innocent bystander. Too often the drunk driver emerges from the accident unscathed while the driver and passengers in the other vehicle are killed and maimed. Making an employer liable for the actions of their employees, even if they are chemically impaired, is generally enough of a deterrent to keep those employers from knowingly hiring someone that puts the rest of us in danger. Step number one in preventing that liability is screening them out before they become employees.
Companies don't do drug testing because they have moral objections to dope. They do the testing because these clowns come to work stoned, get hurt or killed and then the company gets sued for millions and often loses. One big thing this country needs is a legal policy that YOU are responsible for whatever you do to yourself or others, no one else. But the infestation of the legislatures by lawyers of various stenches would never allow it.
โOct-31-2018 06:58 PM
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:Something is not adding up. You have multiple advanced degrees from Stanford. You have had high powered jobs at major companies. Yet your total income is a social security benefit that is less than $1000.00 per month which is 30 percent less than the average Social Security benefit of $1413.00 per month. Apparently thru all your years of working those high powered jobs you never became vested in a pension plan, never funded a 401K, never set up an IRA and never earned a salary that allowed your Social Security benefits to rise much over the absolute minimum benefit of $848.00 due any retiree who has 30 years of employment credits.
Than relatively thriving on a <12,000 dollar per year income. I am around 90% disabled according to Social Insecurity. I only gripe when a wealthy maggot wants a even bigger slice of my meager income. Wealthy maggots do not know how to tie their own shoes. Their trade is theft.
โOct-31-2018 05:45 PM
โOct-31-2018 05:40 PM
JimK-NY wrote:
Sorry, cast iron is too heavy for camping. Also difficult to maintain and still will not match Teflon nonstick.
โOct-31-2018 05:03 PM
โOct-31-2018 04:50 PM
2oldman wrote:larry cad wrote:It hasn't been horrible for the last 10 years, regardless of what the president says.
. The USA economy over the last few decades has been horrible and as a result,larry cad wrote:They're going to have to rethink this requirement if they really want workers.
They interviewed 600 applicants to fill 150 positions and failed because of mandatory drug testing.
If you're stoned on the job, yeah that's bad. If you smoked weed last night, no, that's not bad. If you got roaring drunk over the weekend, no problem.
โOct-31-2018 03:39 PM
โOct-31-2018 01:18 PM
MEXICOWANDERER wrote:
When a near-new pair of Snap-Off flush cutting diagonal cutting pliers went bad on me last January it stopped dead-in-it's-tracks an important job until they can be replaced. Larger Snap-Off dykes are OK but a pair of 1/3rd the price Crescent compound pliers just beats the snot out of the red handled dykes. And there is nothing from japan, taiwan or korea that can vie with Wiha performance or durability.