โJan-30-2022 06:04 AM
โFeb-08-2022 05:26 PM
โFeb-08-2022 05:21 PM
FishOnOne wrote:Yes and the even lower volume EV1 had at least $100,000 wrapped in it. That is why they had closed end leases.pianotuna wrote:
Dadoffourgirls,
I'm not a GM hater. But volt was a wrong path to a BEV.
I owned two GM products over the years and drove them both into the ground.
I recall reading every Volt GM sold had a $10,000 bill wrapped around it per say. GM made more money if they sold less Volts.
โFeb-08-2022 03:47 PM
pianotuna wrote:
Dadoffourgirls,
I'm not a GM hater. But volt was a wrong path to a BEV.
I owned two GM products over the years and drove them both into the ground.
โFeb-08-2022 06:26 AM
โFeb-07-2022 04:59 PM
Dadoffourgirls wrote:Except that is not true.pianotuna wrote:
Reisender,
GM called it a Bev--which it clearly was not.
For you GM haters, the Volt was only powered by battery. The range extending gasoline engine did not power the vehicle. Therefore, it was designated a BEV.
โFeb-07-2022 03:50 PM
Durb wrote:Dadoffourgirls wrote:pianotuna wrote:
Reisender,
GM called it a Bev--which it clearly was not.
For you GM haters, the Volt was only powered by battery. The range extending gasoline engine did not power the vehicle. Therefore, it was designated a BEV.
Couldn't be more wrong. Once the batteries are depleted in the Volt, the gasoline engine hooked up directly to the drive train and would offer another 300+ miles of range. An ingenious design.
Contrary to a subsequent post, the Bolt is not a hybrid. It has a battery and electric motors, that's all.
โFeb-07-2022 01:34 PM
Dadoffourgirls wrote:pianotuna wrote:
Reisender,
GM called it a Bev--which it clearly was not.
For you GM haters, the Volt was only powered by battery. The range extending gasoline engine did not power the vehicle. Therefore, it was designated a BEV.
โFeb-07-2022 06:27 AM
Dadoffourgirls wrote:pianotuna wrote:
Reisender,
GM called it a Bev--which it clearly was not.
For you GM haters, the Volt was only powered by battery. The range extending gasoline engine did not power the vehicle. Therefore, it was designated a BEV.
โFeb-07-2022 02:16 AM
pianotuna wrote:
Reisender,
GM called it a Bev--which it clearly was not.
โFeb-06-2022 09:19 PM
โFeb-06-2022 01:23 PM
pianotuna wrote:time2roll wrote:
I would take a hybrid if I could eliminate the multi-speed transmission, torque converter and reduce the engine by 50% or more.
That sounds similar to the volt car. I always thought it was a swindle to call it a BEV.
โFeb-06-2022 09:18 AM
time2roll wrote:
I would take a hybrid if I could eliminate the multi-speed transmission, torque converter and reduce the engine by 50% or more.
โFeb-06-2022 08:56 AM
โFeb-06-2022 07:53 AM
Reisender wrote:
I canโt speak to other EVโs but speed makes a huge difference for us. We live in BC where most of the interior secondary highways are 80 or 90 kmh and occasionally 100 kmh. The EPA rating for our car is 570 kilometres ish. Easy to achieve on secondary highways as all the little towns along the way cause you to slow down to 50 kmh quite often. But if travelling on the trans Canada or American interstates etc our range drops to probably 20 percent less than the EPA rating. Having said that our Jeep Grand Cherokee was about the same though. Speed really cuts into efficiency regardless of the fuel.
Not an expert. JMHO.