โDec-13-2017 01:31 PM
โDec-14-2017 09:13 PM
Mortimer Brewster wrote:dieseltruckdriver wrote:Mortimer Brewster wrote:The mountains are roughly 10 miles north of where that shot was taken, depending on where it was taken. It is most definitely the south end of the "Southern Hills" as us locals call them.
I couldn't get the mountains in the shot, as they are about 400 miles to the west.
That pic was taken within the Wildlife Loop and was indeed within the southern half of the State Park. Looking at the fire map, Iโm fairly sure it was part of the area affected by the fire.
I tend to be literal and so I donโt consider there to be mountains in the area. This is probably due to the name Black Hills. FWIW, I will readily agree that there are some very mountain-like grades to the north.
I just saw they are forecasting 1-3 inches of snow for Saturday, so that should be a big help with the fire containment. Hopefully everyone will stay safe.
โDec-14-2017 02:28 PM
dieseltruckdriver wrote:Mortimer Brewster wrote:The mountains are roughly 10 miles north of where that shot was taken, depending on where it was taken. It is most definitely the south end of the "Southern Hills" as us locals call them.
I couldn't get the mountains in the shot, as they are about 400 miles to the west.
โDec-14-2017 01:43 PM
Mortimer Brewster wrote:The mountains are roughly 10 miles north of where that shot was taken, depending on where it was taken. It is most definitely the south end of the "Southern Hills" as us locals call them.
Actually I have been there many times. Here is a picture I took in Custer State Park when I was last there in 2015. Those wacky buffalo must have eaten most of the trees. Now that i think about it, I'm fairly certain the buffalo in Custer State Park eat grass, not trees. I couldn't get the mountains in the shot, as they are about 400 miles to the west.
โDec-14-2017 01:40 PM
3oaks wrote:Mortimer Brewster wrote:With that statement, it is very apparent you are not familiar with that part of SW South Dakota at all. :R
Itโs not all bad. Fire is actually beneficial to grasslands. It speeds nutrients to the soil and suppresses tree encroachment.
It is in the Black Hills of SD, not prairie grass lands. Picture mountains with thick forests of Black Pine and Oak trees and meadows. :@
โDec-14-2017 01:22 PM
โDec-14-2017 11:45 AM
โDec-14-2017 11:19 AM
โDec-14-2017 09:04 AM
โDec-14-2017 07:53 AM
3oaks wrote:Mortimer Brewster wrote:With that statement, it is very apparent you are not familiar with that part of SW South Dakota at all. :R
Itโs not all bad. Fire is actually beneficial to grasslands. It speeds nutrients to the soil and suppresses tree encroachment.
It is in the Black Hills of SD, not prairie grass lands. Picture mountains with thick forests of Black Pine and Oak trees and meadows. :@
โDec-14-2017 04:18 AM
Mortimer Brewster wrote:With that statement, it is very apparent you are not familiar with that part of SW South Dakota at all. :R
Itโs not all bad. Fire is actually beneficial to grasslands. It speeds nutrients to the soil and suppresses tree encroachment.
โDec-13-2017 03:47 PM
โDec-13-2017 03:07 PM
โDec-13-2017 02:32 PM
โDec-13-2017 02:18 PM