cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

Koni FSD Shocks

LOG
Explorer
Explorer
Would those members who have installed Koni FSD shocks on their Class C do it again? Or do you regret the decision. Thanks.
LOG
2005 Chinook Glacier
20 REPLIES 20

LOG
Explorer
Explorer
pnichols wrote:
Most RVs on the E350/3500 chassis and larger RVs on the E450/4500 chassis - will have a higher vehicle weight to spring stiffness ratio that is not going to transmit sharp jolts from the roadway into the vehicle nearly as much as a lower ratio will. I'm sure Bilsteins (and many other shock brands) will handle these situations well enough.


Are you saying that an 30 ft rv on a E450 chassis will have a different weight to spring ratio than an 25 ft rv on the E450 chassis? I thought that all E450 chassis in the 2005 year had a rear axle weight rating of 9450 pounds. Are you saying that some E450 chassis have different springs?
LOG
2005 Chinook Glacier

pnichols
Explorer II
Explorer II
As I've stated before in these forums - I have absolute proof that the Koni FSD shocks in the rear of our Class C reduced the cracks/pothole pounding back there when traveling: Both our shower door gravity latch back there now stays latched, and the little plastic shelf on the back wall never has it's contents bounce out.

Of course maybe Bilsteins would have done the same - but nothing in the Bilstein literature states that they provide a damping rate that varies depending upon the quickness (frequency) of road surface change.

I really think that where the high frequency light damping mode of the Koni FSD shocks comes into it's own is on RVs that are really stiff springed relative to the motorhome's weight (which is our situation with a 24 foot Class C on the E450 chassis). In these situations a quick bump in the road does not need any shock's resistance added to the spring's resistance - so light or no shock damping is better for reducing the jolt.

Most RVs on the E350/3500 chassis and larger RVs on the E450/4500 chassis - will have a higher vehicle weight to spring stiffness ratio that is not going to transmit sharp jolts from the roadway into the vehicle nearly as much as a lower ratio will. I'm sure Bilsteins (and many other shock brands) will handle these situations well enough.
2005 E450 Itasca 24V Class C

IAMICHABOD
Explorer II
Explorer II
OFDPOS wrote:
Nope would not do it again . Yes I regret putting them on.
Listened to the popcorn gallery instead of my gut feeling telling me to stay with the Bilstein's !


I have read all of your posts about the FSD shocks and I would not be interested in them at all,I will stick with my Bilsteins!

I was wondering if This offer is still open,who knows you may have a taker :B :B :B
2006 TIOGA 26Q CHEVY 6.0 WORKHORSE VORTEC
Former El Monte RV Rental
Retired Teamster Local 692
Buying A Rental Class C

OFDPOS
Explorer
Explorer
Nope would not do it again . Yes I regret putting them on.
Listened to the popcorn gallery instead of my gut feeling telling me to stay with the Bilstein's !

bobndot
Explorer II
Explorer II
I recvd some helpful KONI FSD info in the below link.
After just adding a camber kit and the alignment, the ride is so much better.
My next adventure will be adding the Koni's in the rear and the less expensive Bils in the front.


https://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/29692525.cfm

DrewE
Explorer II
Explorer II
No regrets; when the time comes I'll probably do it again (or perhaps pay someone to do it again for me in the case of the fronts). I hope I don't have to, though, for some time yet.