Wingman v/s New Jack Antenna

[gjtrafl]

I have an '07 National with the standard Winegard Batman antenna.

My question is where do you get the most bang for your buck... going with the Wingman attachment or would I be better off by replacing to the Jack Antenna?

Costs seem to range from in the $30-$40 range for the wingman and $60-$70 for the Jack.

Looking for a cheap improvement. Any thoughts and experiences?

Thanks!

[SCVJeff]

Bill.Satellite wrote:

Ron3rd wrote:

Bill.Satellite wrote:
Get the Wingman.

And if you add the Sensar Pro, you'll have the gold standard for RV antennas.

+1

+2

[Bill_Satellite]

Ron3rd wrote:

Bill.Satellite wrote:
Get the Wingman.

And if you add the Sensar Pro, you'll have the gold standard for RV antennas.

+1

[pa_traveler]

Sensar4 or pro with batwing,had rv dealer compare this to jack antenna. Sensar did way better.

[Ron3rd]

Bill.Satellite wrote:
Get the Wingman.

And if you add the Sensar Pro, you'll have the gold standard for RV antennas.

[Bill_Satellite]

Get the Wingman.

[Triker33]

On test the Wingman add on will let the Batwing outdo the Jack on distance.
And you will save you $$.

Wingman

[MNtundraRet]

For the Op, adding the Wingman to current antenna is better than the Jack.

For Sensor versus Winegard Sensor Air, I find the Air will find more stations but may have a shorter range for getting stations found in the lower VHF range (2 to 6 real RF channels) .

The best method is to add a second adjustable in -line adjustable amplifier to increase gain to maximum 20 DBS ( $30). My range is up to 110 miles day and 180 miles night or cloudy.

[wildtoad]

I've had the wingman, Jack, and the new Rayzor. Of the three the Batwing/wingman combination is about as good as it gets for over the air television. That said, if you are in a remote area, surrounded by trees, TV will still be spotty.

[n7bsn]

Tests on those antennas link