Jul-28-2015 09:25 PM
Jul-30-2015 02:31 PM
Deb and Ed M wrote:Not unless you have a death wish.:E. It would be like throwing a rock at a hornets nest.DOTLDaddy wrote:fla-gypsy wrote:
Typical pet owner responses. My dog is special and different. It's despicable behavior
Gee . . . . kinda harsh.:E
Especially on the Pet Forum! Can we go over to the Class A forum and complain about how noisy and stinky the diesels are?? 😉
Jul-30-2015 02:24 PM
Jul-30-2015 02:06 PM
dturm wrote:Pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis) infections are the most common worm infection in America. Although any individual may develop a case of pinworms, the infection occurs most frequently in school children between 5 to 10 years of age. Pinworm infections occur in all socioeconomic groups; however, human-to-human spread is favored by close, crowded living conditions. Spread among family members is common. Animals do not harbor pinworms - humans are the only natural host for this parasite.
Get your facts straight.
Jul-30-2015 01:52 PM
drsolo wrote:Thank you, professor. 🙂 I have never heard the subject of "picking up poop" sound so . . . . . scientific!:C:W
I agree with the the well reasoned and scientifically supported facts of ernie1. I am really dismayed by the many ad hominem attacks flung around like caged monkey scat. But it got me to thinking about the evolution of science, medicine and cultural anthropology in the area of human wastes. In some parts of the world people like to go off into the bush and relieve themselves even when there are sanitary facilities available. This is very much a cultural difference and it is difficult to change how people are "used" to doing things. I dont think anybody disputes that it is not civilized nor healthy for human beings to pee or defecate in populated areas both for reasons of health as well as smell. And our disgust at happening upon errant human defecation in situ or in progress is irregardless of possible wildlife defecation in the same area. Culturally we differentiate between the two. The proximity of dogs and cats to humans present a higher risk in the transmission of disease (zoonosis) by their raw wastes. And within the US we differ socially in our tolerance of the site and smell of animal dung. So farmers are probably not going to be bothered by dog dung while city folk just go ballistic by the sight or smell of it on the cityscape. It is why signs are posted "curb your dog" meaning dont let them take a dump on the sidewalk and it is much easier to walk a dog down the middle of the road at a CG than in a city.
So back to the CG where we have a mix of people from farm/country, the city and everything in between converge with different tolerances, preferences, expectations and experiences. It doesnt make anyone wrong or right. No need for attacks.
Walter & Garland - Camp Canine caretakers
Miss Inga (aka "Shorty") - 10 y.o. old GSD.
Gen. Gretchen - Joined Rainbow Div., June 27, 2017 at age 13
Gen. Missy - Joined Rainbow Div., June 11,2006 at age 12
2018 Montana HC305RL 5th wheel
2018 Silverado HD 6.0L
Jul-30-2015 01:39 PM
Jul-30-2015 12:41 PM
roam1 wrote:
We were eating breakfast outside on our site while a lady walked up and relieved both of her dogs in front of us....
Walter & Garland - Camp Canine caretakers
Miss Inga (aka "Shorty") - 10 y.o. old GSD.
Gen. Gretchen - Joined Rainbow Div., June 27, 2017 at age 13
Gen. Missy - Joined Rainbow Div., June 11,2006 at age 12
2018 Montana HC305RL 5th wheel
2018 Silverado HD 6.0L
Jul-30-2015 12:08 PM
Jul-30-2015 11:30 AM
Jul-30-2015 10:30 AM
Jul-30-2015 10:16 AM
4X4Dodger wrote:Deb and Ed M wrote:
I also propose (once again) - that the folks on the Pet Forum who own dogs are PAINFULLY aware of how much certain RVers hate our pets. I'd bet we are the poop-pickupiest bunch of people you could ever run into. We fly our blue bags like Tibetan Prayer Flags. We post ad nauseum about how to keep our dogs from barking. We REALLY TRY TO BE GOOD CAMPERS. But not everyone reads RV.net (gasp!)
On the other hand, most of us have confessed that part of our desire to RV is to have our pets with us. Most of us will NOT board our pets for an extended period. If RV parks banned pet owners - they would not be in business very long (unless they raised their rates to cover the lost income), because we ARE a considerable chunk of the camping population. Then EVERYONE would lose.
Very TRUE and well said.
Jul-30-2015 09:27 AM
Jul-30-2015 08:58 AM
Deb and Ed M wrote:
I also propose (once again) - that the folks on the Pet Forum who own dogs are PAINFULLY aware of how much certain RVers hate our pets. I'd bet we are the poop-pickupiest bunch of people you could ever run into. We fly our blue bags like Tibetan Prayer Flags. We post ad nauseum about how to keep our dogs from barking. We REALLY TRY TO BE GOOD CAMPERS. But not everyone reads RV.net (gasp!)
On the other hand, most of us have confessed that part of our desire to RV is to have our pets with us. Most of us will NOT board our pets for an extended period. If RV parks banned pet owners - they would not be in business very long (unless they raised their rates to cover the lost income), because we ARE a considerable chunk of the camping population. Then EVERYONE would lose.
Jul-30-2015 07:00 AM
Deb and Ed M wrote:
On the other hand, most of us have confessed that part of our desire to RV is to have our pets with us. Most of us will NOT board our pets for an extended period. If RV parks banned pet owners - they would not be in business very long (unless they raised their rates to cover the lost income), because we ARE a considerable chunk of the camping population. Then EVERYONE would lose.
Jul-30-2015 06:02 AM
Jul-30-2015 05:41 AM
DOTLDaddy wrote:fla-gypsy wrote:
Typical pet owner responses. My dog is special and different. It's despicable behavior
Gee . . . . kinda harsh.:E