โAug-07-2023 12:56 AM
โAug-24-2023 07:12 AM
Itinerant1 wrote:
With my control displays at easy reach or viewing bluetooth personally would be of no benefit. The system now is something just runs in the background quietly.
โAug-23-2023 10:39 AM
โAug-23-2023 10:15 AM
3 tons wrote:
Agree, LFPโs have proven to be quite tolerant to a wide variety of discharge and charge strategies, and single voltage charging is quite simple all the while skipping the nail biting frequency for a full chargeโฆKinda funny for those who recall all the fact-less boogieman fictions that were being actively pushed in the not so distant past - lolโฆ
3 tons
โAug-23-2023 07:19 AM
โAug-23-2023 05:47 AM
S Davis wrote:
At 3500 cycles they should still have 80% of their rated capacity.
โAug-22-2023 04:47 PM
โAug-22-2023 05:53 AM
Itinerant1 wrote:StirCrazy wrote:Itinerant1 wrote:
Just curious if the batteries are working with the predetermined settings in the sealed box why would you want to experiment with them?
easy cycle life. if I can change the top and bottom from 0 to 100% to 10 to 90% that can take your average LfP from 3500 cycles to 4500 to 5000. then if you operate in the top 3rd of that you can go even higher. If I knew I could get into a battery like a chins I may have bought them instead of making my own just to be lazy, but I use the settings in my Bluetooth quite a bit. I have 3 profiles on my phone for setting the BMS, I have a storage routine where the BMS will only charge the cells to 65% of the capacity then won't recharge until they drop below 30% as well my cold temp cut off is bumped up to 3C to be safe. I have a "getting ready to go camping" setting where it sets the bottom at 10%, puts the cold temp cut off back to 1C and charges to 100%. then I have a "camping" setup where the only difference is I lower the top to 90%.
I can limit the battery as I have a 10-day capacity without the solar and unlimited time with the solar, so I decided to make the battery last a bit longer and sacrifice about 2 days' worth of capacity. The batteries are top balanced and topped right up whenever I leave the house on a camping trip.
So basically, cycle life, and the ability to be over cautious on some of your safety settings is the reason.
Ok, thanks for the info.
Seems like alot of work but then you have different needs and colder weather.
As far as cycle life why worry about do you really think your going to use it up? I bet more folks will kill their batteries hen pecking them.
Right now I've done 2,502 days (boondocking) of 2,686 days since install. I'm somewhere over 1,000 full cycles and that's 7 years 4 months. A seasonal camper the batteries should last along time.
I guess living off mine fulltime with solar one set of settings. Charge to 14.1v (my 100% SOC), float 13.6, if they get full great and if not tomorrows another day solar might fill the tank. Still use whatever in the 5th wheel including the air conditioner.
โAug-22-2023 05:45 AM
3 tons wrote:
Interesting ๐ FWIW, what youโre describing is pretty much how I opt to cycle and charge my drop-in LFPโs.
Before departing, I fully charge and balance the two 200a/hr paralleled batteries, but after that they tend to kinda float off of solar harvest, routinely cycling them (harvest dependentโฆ) from about 80-90โish% SOC, to something lower and then back againโฆAfter about 4 or so โless that full rechargeโ cycles, I typically opt for another 100% full recharge to restore proper cell balance and to address cumulative metering driftโฆA voltage programmable solar controller (with programmable โpost full chargeโ time-out) makes unattended charging an easy option (i.e. avoiding the possibility of an over chargeโฆ)โฆSince thereโs really no absorption phase, just a single voltage, and no real need to routinely fully re-charge, charging has proved to be uber straightforward and uncomplicatedโฆ
3 tons
โAug-21-2023 07:12 PM
StirCrazy wrote:Itinerant1 wrote:
Just curious if the batteries are working with the predetermined settings in the sealed box why would you want to experiment with them?
easy cycle life. if I can change the top and bottom from 0 to 100% to 10 to 90% that can take your average LfP from 3500 cycles to 4500 to 5000. then if you operate in the top 3rd of that you can go even higher. If I knew I could get into a battery like a chins I may have bought them instead of making my own just to be lazy, but I use the settings in my Bluetooth quite a bit. I have 3 profiles on my phone for setting the BMS, I have a storage routine where the BMS will only charge the cells to 65% of the capacity then won't recharge until they drop below 30% as well my cold temp cut off is bumped up to 3C to be safe. I have a "getting ready to go camping" setting where it sets the bottom at 10%, puts the cold temp cut off back to 1C and charges to 100%. then I have a "camping" setup where the only difference is I lower the top to 90%.
I can limit the battery as I have a 10-day capacity without the solar and unlimited time with the solar, so I decided to make the battery last a bit longer and sacrifice about 2 days' worth of capacity. The batteries are top balanced and topped right up whenever I leave the house on a camping trip.
So basically, cycle life, and the ability to be over cautious on some of your safety settings is the reason.
โAug-21-2023 07:58 AM
โAug-21-2023 06:54 AM
Itinerant1 wrote:
Just curious if the batteries are working with the predetermined settings in the sealed box why would you want to experiment with them?
โAug-20-2023 10:52 AM
Itinerant1 wrote:
Just curious if the batteries are working with the predetermined settings in the sealed box why would you want to experiment with them?
โAug-20-2023 09:14 AM
โAug-20-2023 08:29 AM
3 tons wrote:
Got it, kinda interestingโฆFWIW, my drop-ins are tamper-proof - but either way, since mine came with a 10yr warranty Iโm happy to leave the experimentation option to the more capable and adventurous ๐
3 tons