โNov-12-2023 04:19 AM
โNov-13-2023 05:04 AM
ksss wrote:FishOnOne wrote:
It won't be long before this engine goes the way of 3.0 Ecodiesel and Power Stroke.
If it does, it wasn't because it hasn't been a good engine. I think it is still around because of how good it is. GM went to the effort of updating it recently, had they planned to kill it, it would have made sense to kill it prior to spending the money to update it. That said, I am not saying that GM and everyone else doesn't spend money in a seeming moronic way sometimes. I think the EPA and politics have more play in what stays and what goes these days. It seems like the EV winds are changing somewhat from the promises made a several years ago. So maybe it will stay for a while.
โNov-12-2023 09:25 PM
FishOnOne wrote:
It won't be long before this engine goes the way of 3.0 Ecodiesel and Power Stroke.
โNov-12-2023 12:51 PM
โNov-12-2023 07:12 AM
โNov-23-2023 05:59 AM
If that is actually the case, 146k ainโt bad for a high tech, high revving, relatively high performance engine with sub par maintenance. Canโt watch 46min of something so mundane to see how rj deduced this. But can say we have a fleet of 3.0s dating back to 2019 models, some with well over 100k and the owner keeps buying them due to their reliability combined with stellar fuel mileage.
GM has the floor now. If theyโre not cranking out as many of them as they can, theyโre on crack. No competition and same power and 10mpg better than equivalent gassers is a winning combo. They also have the short trip regen figured out.
I like simple and these arenโt, but if I was buying a new half ton tomorrow it would be one of these. Hands down.