Dec-01-2017 09:21 AM
Dec-06-2017 01:33 PM
Dec-06-2017 01:17 PM
mountainkowboy wrote:
edited, your not worth my time
Dec-06-2017 12:51 PM
TomG2 wrote:mountainkowboy wrote:
Sorry, blue collar worker and left school at 15 to make a living. 😛
At least you are good at name calling.
Dec-06-2017 12:13 PM
troubledwaters wrote:
Commented Deleted on Edit - This stupid thread (which has the same tired arguments as the last 500 similar threads - to no avail), is way overdue to be done. Bye Bye - Ya'all can buy whatever you want with your money, and I'll buy what I want.
Dec-06-2017 11:01 AM
Dec-06-2017 11:01 AM
mountainkowboy wrote:
Sorry, blue collar worker and left school at 15 to make a living. 😛
Dec-06-2017 10:52 AM
TomG2 wrote:
Ouch! Name calling is really cool and smart. By the way, it would be the contraction you're for you are, not your.
Dec-06-2017 10:44 AM
Huntindog wrote:
Great observation from a person who's newest vehicle is an 2011! Also has an 2006, and a 1978!
Dec-06-2017 09:11 AM
Dec-06-2017 07:13 AM
Dec-06-2017 07:01 AM
Dec-05-2017 09:45 PM
mountainkowboy wrote:Great observation from a person who's newest vehicle is an 2011!Ralph Cramden wrote:Huntindog wrote:
As far as the current discussion about half ton capability.What is missing is the durability of the half tons vs their heavier duty siblings.
Despite being true, good luck getting that point across to many on this or any other RV related board.
Yup cause you should always buy twice the truck needed to tow with :R, 90% of vehicles are only owned for 4 years, so durability usually isn't an issue.
Dec-05-2017 04:21 PM
1stgenfarmboy wrote:
Well.........shoot then.......I ain't gonna say you got it made..................but.
:B
Dec-05-2017 11:11 AM
jaycocreek wrote:But on the other hand, if I had an Excursion, or a 250 Van, with appropriately the same weight and wheel base, it's isn't an issue.
Laughing...But that is the truth on this forum.
If people would just read they could find things out.I read on a 2015 F-150 to find out they had three different axles and three different frame specs,depending on the package you choose..Example is the 9.75 HD axle rated higher than the 8.8 and 9.75 standard.
To bad they just don't have two variants,a standard F-150 and a HD 150 with the HD having all the packages to tow or haul advertised towing and hauling weights...That sure would make it black and white for the dis-believers!
Dec-05-2017 10:47 AM
troubledwaters wrote:You are misunderstanding what I wrote.Huntindog wrote:First you start out by saying there is no score or grade, just pass and fail. Then you say the GM "easily" passed while the others "barely" passed. Since no one there was keeping score you witnessed all the testing to make that determination? Did you witness all the testing every year or just one year?demiles wrote:The J standard is ballyhooed a lot.
FYI The SAE j2807 towing standard is available for free around the web. If you can’t find it I can send a link to my own copy.
Though it is a huge step in the right direction compared to the previously used no standards... Tow ratings used to be totally fiction, as every manufacturer made up their own.
It is important to understand what the J standard is, and what it is not.
It is a MINIMUM standard, with a no score or grade. Just a pass or fail. There is no way to know if the truck barely passed the test, or easily passed it.
IIRCC, it requires 35 MPH speed be maintained up a specified grade (among other requirements).
Many of us here, myself included do not consider that acceptable performance. So that standard is pretty useless for us.
A real life example: The current GM diesel offerings are not rated nearly as high as Ram and Ford according to the J standard. But in towing performance tests among the three at GMs ratings. the GM wins handily.
GM has stated that they want their trucks to deliver an acceptable level of performance because that is what their customers expect. So their trucks easily pass the J standard at the GM specified load. Where the Ram and Ford with higher ratings barely pass the J test at their rated load.
One could make the assumption that the GM could tow just as much as the other two.. I am not advocating that. There are some obvious differences. Axle ratios for one. GM only uses the 3.73 and the others use lower gears in their max to configurations.. This obviously will result in the ability to move heavier loads up a hill, but at slower speeds.
As far as the current discussion about half ton capability.What is missing is the durability of the half tons vs their heavier duty siblings. IOW, you may never have an issue using a half ton towing heavy so long as usage is low. But as usage goes up, so does wear and tear.
I personally experienced this on a half ton I started out with.
The rear end gears simply ground away.
In certain areas... Size matters.
Please share with us your first hand observations. We'd all like to know what you know.