Mar-16-2017 07:26 PM
Mar-21-2017 04:06 AM
Mar-20-2017 03:16 PM
beaker305 wrote:
Hello everyone, brand new here and to RVing in general. Here is my story and I hope some of you can provide some insight:
I just recently purchased a 2017 Ford Explorer 4wd V6 with the class 3 towing package. The towing rating is 5,000 lbs. I went to an RV show last weekend and found a travel trailer that I loved and saw that it came in at 4500 lbs....500 less than my vehicle is rated for. I signed the buyers order and planned to pick it up this coming weekend. Over the past few days I have been educating myself on all things RV and came across a lot of mixed information about towing and weights. (Especially that vehicle manufacturers overstate towing capacities and RV manufacturers understate trailer weights) I'm afraid now that my vehicle won't really be able to tow this trailer and I'll be stuck once I get to the dealership to pick this up. Shame on me for not doing enough research ahead of time, but it ended up being one of those impulse decisions. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Mar-20-2017 02:35 PM
boosTT wrote:
Lookup SAE J2807.
It may have been over rated previously by Ford.
Mar-20-2017 02:12 PM
Redwoodcamper wrote:
Although I try to adhere to the tow ratings of vehicles, and encourage others to do the same, the vehicle isn't the biggest part of safe towing. It's crazy to me how much emphasis people will put on a stamp on the doorframe, and how little people worry about driving skill. I don't encourage it but I have towed many tens of thousands of miles over tow ratings. For 15+ yrs. Without any Scarry moments or accidents. Sometimes near double tow ratings. I wouldn't do it again today, but the biggest part of safety is the driver.
It's the same principle that's wrong with newer traffic laws and safety standards. Instead of teaching someone better driving skills, they try to put a band aid on the problem by making speed limits slower and bumpers better.
Don't get me wrong. Most new members buying a trailer should get a warning and should know the differences in ratings. Thanks for helping folks out and trying to keep the roads safe. But the bottom line isn't always as black and white as people think.
Mar-20-2017 07:33 AM
horton333 wrote:boosTT wrote:
Frame, suspension, wheels are different. It may have plenty of power, but that's not the only thing that matters. Does the old explorer ride the same?
The new frame is more rigid (not that the old was weak), the tires have much stronger sidewalls due to much lower aspect ratio, suspension significantly upgraded. Of course there is more than just the better power, there are numerous other advantages (especially getting rid of that weak POS transfer case on the old ones like mine). You forgot the brakes too, huge improvement on the new Explorer.
Hint as alluded above there is one thing worse than when it was a 7,200# rating , I really doubt any of the several people above who made such strong comments on how bad it is can figure that regression out - but I'll just throw that out that there as there is one I'm aware of (manageable actually).
No: I cannot see how anyone can justify this advertised huge decrease in capacity, unless you have slavish belief in marketing numbers. It is capable, unless something silly done like cramming 7 adults in too.
Mar-18-2017 10:09 PM
Mar-18-2017 12:46 PM
Mar-18-2017 12:42 PM
horton333 wrote:
You are entitled to your opinion but...forgive me if I disagree.
Mar-18-2017 11:57 AM
SoundGuy wrote:horton333 wrote:
Anyway the damage is done.
In your opinion, but many others would define this as "good advice". 😉
Mar-18-2017 10:46 AM
horton333 wrote:
Anyway the damage is done.
Mar-18-2017 10:17 AM
SoundGuy wrote:horton333 wrote:
If you look at the Pathfinder, a significantly less capable vehicle, they pass this standard at 6,000#.
Sure, because the J2807 standard is far more complex and takes into consideration not just load but various characteristics of the particular vehicle involved, not the least of which are available axle ratio(s), tire sizes, transmission characteristics, engine characteristics, etc, etc, along with the ability of that particular vehicle to negotiate taxing upgrades. Of course the ratings are different, that's what J2807 is intended to reflect. To compare one particular vehicle to another just because they're both similarly sized SUVs is ridiculous when all the work has been done for you with J2807. You may choose to believe this is yet more "marketing hubub" designed to fool the masses but for those of us who believe J2807 really is an improvement in how vehicles are rated for towing there's NO WAY one could conclude the OP's Explorer is suitable for towing a 6000 lb 26' travel trailer. :R
Mar-18-2017 08:42 AM
lawrosa wrote:
The 199ml shows no specs. Do you know what they are?
http://www.keystonerv.com/passport/#/floorplans
Also what did the dealer say????
Mar-18-2017 08:36 AM
lawrosa wrote:
That unit looks very nice..
Video 178LHS
Mar-18-2017 08:31 AM