โNov-28-2014 09:18 AM
โDec-01-2014 01:24 PM
wintersun wrote:
. . . and the tires should handle at least 11,000 lbs. . .
โDec-01-2014 10:51 AM
โDec-01-2014 09:34 AM
โDec-01-2014 04:51 AM
tonymull wrote:
No that trick doesn't work, and why would you do that when the payload (with factory equipment) is posted on the door where he is getting those two numbers???
โNov-30-2014 01:00 PM
โNov-30-2014 12:41 PM
โNov-30-2014 11:59 AM
โNov-30-2014 10:15 AM
โNov-30-2014 05:01 AM
bjbear wrote:bighatnohorse wrote:
Yes, looking at a purchasing a used truck and being told to weigh the truck isn't very practical advice.
When looking at a used dually, look at the rear tire's printed ratings.
There are two ratings printed on a dually tire.
One rating states that it is for use on a dually (it's a lower rating).
The other rating states a higher rating (for SRW axle).
Take the lower printed rating on the rear tire - double that number and you will be very, very close to the official payload capacity rating.
I've stated this before in another post.
It is a dumb simple accurate method to find payload capacity (unless the tires are not OEM rated tires).
You need a quick and dirty method of determining payload.
. . .
Interesting idea... My tires are 2560 lbs, so double that is 5120 lbs. My payload is 5362 lbs. So it works in my case. Not sure if it works in every case, but it would be interesting to see how accurate it really is. I think I will stay with real weights, but for an initial guestimate when looking at an unknown truck, it might be a good "rule of thumb".
โNov-30-2014 04:53 AM
ruthiebaby88 wrote:
So dually = tire rating x2
โNov-29-2014 10:49 AM
bjbear wrote:ruthiebaby88 wrote:
I just thought it was strange that a DRW 1 ton GMC Sierra would have a max payload of 2482#?
GVWR of 10000, GAVR 4500, GAWR 7500
The tires are 16s.
The truck did seem huge, very long - do you think they used up the weight with an extra long bed?
I would pass on this truck if you can. The weight ratings are too low to justify going to a dually. Depends on the price (and your budget), I'm thinking you might find a newer 3/4 ton that is just as "truck camper capable" as this one.
Ok my tires are 2910 which than would be 5820. The label on the truck reads 5022 so I'm well within. I have a 2008 F350 V10 4X4 with upgrades to shocks etc. I would have to get a lot bigger camper before I start worrying.
If you can get the dealer to cooperate, I would recommend getting the truck weighed. Then you can figure out what the real weights will be when you add the camper of your choice. You may want to check out http://www.visualsc.com/tc_calc.htm. It lets you calculate weights and provides info on the different weight limits.
โNov-29-2014 09:57 AM
โNov-29-2014 09:32 AM
โNov-29-2014 06:49 AM
bighatnohorse wrote:
Yes, looking at a purchasing a used truck and being told to weigh the truck isn't very practical advice.
When looking at a used dually, look at the rear tire's printed ratings.
There are two ratings printed on a dually tire.
One rating states that it is for use on a dually (it's a lower rating).
The other rating states a higher rating (for SRW axle).
Take the lower printed rating on the rear tire - double that number and you will be very, very close to the official payload capacity rating.
I've stated this before in another post.
It is a dumb simple accurate method to find payload capacity (unless the tires are not OEM rated tires).
You need a quick and dirty method of determing payload.
You're looking at used trucks - and you'll need to kiss a lot of pigs before you find that prince.
The rig you want, at your price point, is out there. It will take a lot of looking and patience.
Or a little bit of luck.
โNov-29-2014 05:52 AM
ruthiebaby88 wrote:
I just thought it was strange that a DRW 1 ton GMC Sierra would have a max payload of 2482#?
GVWR of 10000, GAVR 4500, GAWR 7500
The tires are 16s.
The truck did seem huge, very long - do you think they used up the weight with an extra long bed?