โOct-25-2013 07:28 AM
โNov-05-2013 07:34 AM
Turtle n Peeps wrote:W4RLR wrote:Turtle n Peeps wrote:Spare us, and spare the dearly departed equine that you and your friend the Dodge fanatic love to beat.You can google all you want, but this was my experience so take it or leave it I really don't care.
Naaaaaa, that's ok. If you couldn't find it I'm sure I can't find it.........and you know what that means!
Now if you want me to find threads about 6.0'ssssssss, (what this thread is all about) that I can do. I heard Google had to add thousands of more servers to their system when the 6.0 came out. :B
Spin it how you want, I just call it like I see it. I own Chevy trucks, I also own a Dodge car and race Ford cars so I'm no fan boy of one make like you. To call it like it is, the Ford V10 gas is one of the best if not the best tow motor out there. Great engine!
You say dearly departed and that is true.
You want new diesel? I will talk new diesel. And this from Ford owners and techs:
Read post #6 from a Ford tech. Then read post 8. :E Then look at the date.
Another Ricatic failure. This one 25 grand worth!
Another Ricatic failure that Ford won't pay for.
Is it the turbo? the wastegate? or the valves? Could be your driving style? 7th visit we will know.
Pull over safely now son!
Another pull over safely now son.
Another ambulance only problem.
Turbo went boom.
More turbo's go boom.
Engine goes boom, then reman engines go boom.
More turbo problems
40,000 miles, 2 turbo's 1 engine.
The above are very serious problems and there is a pattern. Go talk to some Ford tech's to learn the truth.
I can't wait for the spin doctors. :R
โNov-05-2013 07:29 AM
โNov-05-2013 07:15 AM
W4RLR wrote:Turtle n Peeps wrote:Spare us, and spare the dearly departed equine that you and your friend the Dodge fanatic love to beat.You can google all you want, but this was my experience so take it or leave it I really don't care.
Naaaaaa, that's ok. If you couldn't find it I'm sure I can't find it.........and you know what that means!
Now if you want me to find threads about 6.0'ssssssss, (what this thread is all about) that I can do. I heard Google had to add thousands of more servers to their system when the 6.0 came out. :B
โNov-05-2013 02:24 AM
Wes Tausend wrote:
...
Noisy lifters after extended non-use, means faulty oil filters that drain back. ๐
Wes
...
โNov-05-2013 12:36 AM
Turtle n Peeps wrote:Spare us, and spare the dearly departed equine that you and your friend the Dodge fanatic love to beat.You can google all you want, but this was my experience so take it or leave it I really don't care.
Naaaaaa, that's ok. If you couldn't find it I'm sure I can't find it.........and you know what that means!
Now if you want me to find threads about 6.0'ssssssss, (what this thread is all about) that I can do. I heard Google had to add thousands of more servers to their system when the 6.0 came out. :B
โNov-04-2013 06:24 PM
โNov-04-2013 05:21 AM
You can google all you want, but this was my experience so take it or leave it I really don't care.
โNov-03-2013 11:39 PM
โNov-03-2013 06:05 PM
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
Funny Troy your the only guy saying that. I did a Google search and could not come up with anything about "lifter noise" for 1992 Rams. Heck Edmunds.com gives the 1992 Ram 150,250 and 350 four stars same as the ford trucks. Don't you think if they were the POS you say they were they would have a lower rating the Fords? :h Or maybe Fords are just as bad! :B
Don
โNov-03-2013 05:40 PM
FishOnOne wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
Troy having worked in an engine plant I can tell you that had a 318/5.2 or any other engine for that mater left with lifter noise the Plant would have been notefid. Also if the assembly plant noticed it they would not ship it! Fact not fiction Troy. The early 5.7 Hemi had a TSB for lifter noise but that's the only one I know of.
Talk about "lame posts".:R
Don
Don,
Having cold started many new 318's and a few 360's and hearing lifter tick was the norm on these new trucks, so I can't say much about your Quality Control program at that factory! Perhaps this was an issue with trucks not broken in?
Hate to bust your bubble! :W
โNov-03-2013 05:07 PM
โNov-03-2013 02:59 PM
Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
Troy having worked in an engine plant I can tell you that had a 318/5.2 or any other engine for that mater left with lifter noise the Plant would have been notefid. Also if the assembly plant noticed it they would not ship it! Fact not fiction Troy. The early 5.7 Hemi had a TSB for lifter noise but that's the only one I know of.
Talk about "lame posts".:R
Don
โNov-03-2013 10:12 AM
โNov-03-2013 06:01 AM
FishOnOne wrote:catfishmontana wrote:FishOnOne wrote:Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
And yet the sheep still keep drinking the Blue Cool-Aid and are happy about it :h .But then it did take this sheep four times, five if you count the junk 1992 replacement truck before I left Ford. Bha Bha little sheep.
Don
So are you saying the Dodge RAM trucks were better in '92? I remember having to move those Dodge RAM trucks around on the dealer lot back in '88 and it took a couple of minutes for the lifters to stop ticking after a cold start. Those 318's were some real pieces of work I might say!
In addition moving the Chevy's and GMC's didn't have the lifter ticking issue like the Dodges. :h
I don't remember those roller cam/lifters making much noise in those 318's. In fact, most Mopar valve trains were fairly quiet when new. Not only were they rollered during that year, but they also still maintained the shaft mount rocker setup. If my memory serves me correctly, pretty quiet. I still have a half dozen or so LA small blocks and race with them during the summer months. Even the high mileage ones are pretty quiet.
These were brand new trucks Dodge trucks sitting on a grass lot that I would move ~ 1/week in order to mow that lot. Every Dodge truck would litterly tick for a couple of minutes during the cold start. This was during the summer months in Texas.
Also I do recall Chevy had a batch of bad cams in '82 that would go flat a cause poor performance.