Nov-28-2017 09:18 AM
Nov-30-2017 04:03 PM
SidecarFlip wrote:
Isn't that the notorious 'Twin Beam' front suspension? The bushing eater? I had one, a 7.3. Kept it about a year and got rid of it.
Nov-30-2017 03:52 PM
Nov-30-2017 01:44 PM
Nov-29-2017 06:31 AM
blofgren wrote:SidecarFlip wrote:
Never been overly fond of the early manuals. The 'Ford has a better idea' hydraulic actuated clutch is a pizzer. It's not adjustable unless you machine an adjustable push rod and even then, the slave will leak down when it gets older and cause clashing gears. Had one of those too. 4 speed with a creeper in a 6.9 Barnyard Buick.
My 95 had a solid actuator rod that I machine a 2 piece one to replace it. Mine wasn't. Maybe yours is.
I'll stick with the built E4 thank you.
Dude, why are you posting multiple times in what appears to be pi$$ing on the OP's parade? The trucks that you are comparing his truck to have nothing in common....And like the OP, I would much rather have the ZF6 any day over a slush box.
OP, you did good. As others have posted, the 7.3L, ZF6 manual combo Super Duty is one of the most desirable trucks that Ford has ever made. The manual transfer case and hubs are a definite bonus.
And yes, that truck has a solid front axle, a granny low gear to get a heavy load started, and is still the best looking Super Duty era to date IMO. As a matter of fact, I looked long and hard for a '99-'03 F-350 CC 4x4 DRW Lariat 7.3L 6 speed prior to buying my current truck with no luck.
Please keep us in the know about it and it would be great to see some pics! :B
Oh, and you will notice a huge difference pulling compared to a 5.3L Chevy! :C
Nov-28-2017 07:32 PM
SidecarFlip wrote:
Isn't that the notorious 'Twin Beam' front suspension? The bushing eater? I had one, a 7.3. Kept it about a year and got rid of it.
Nov-28-2017 07:06 PM
Nov-28-2017 05:45 PM
SidecarFlip wrote:
Never been overly fond of the early manuals. The 'Ford has a better idea' hydraulic actuated clutch is a pizzer. It's not adjustable unless you machine an adjustable push rod and even then, the slave will leak down when it gets older and cause clashing gears. Had one of those too. 4 speed with a creeper in a 6.9 Barnyard Buick.
My 95 had a solid actuator rod that I machine a 2 piece one to replace it. Mine wasn't. Maybe yours is.
I'll stick with the built E4 thank you.
Nov-28-2017 05:31 PM
Nov-28-2017 04:22 PM
LanceRKeys wrote:
This should keep me from constantly worrying about the transmission when pulling, ...
Nov-28-2017 03:25 PM
George H wrote:
my 01 F350 4X4 is solid front axle, I equate turning radius to an aircraft carrier. I've been towing 13k+ 5er for the last 11 years and covered 13 Western states (including multiple crossings of the Rockies). Not the fastest pulling hills but great truck.
Nov-28-2017 03:21 PM
Grit dog wrote:SidecarFlip wrote:
Never been overly fond of the early manuals. The 'Ford has a better idea' hydraulic actuated clutch is a pizzer. It's not adjustable unless you machine an adjustable push rod and even then, the slave will leak down when it gets older and cause clashing gears. Had one of those too. 4 speed with a creeper in a 6.9 Barnyard Buick.
Well they didn’t make any “late” manuals, so guess you’re safe now....lol.
Fwiw, my pizzer hyd actuated clutch cylinders have over 100kmiles on them and are adjustable. They make adjustable hydros for pickups.
If you’re trying to talk up any 4 speed auto trans in comparison to a 6 speed manual, other than for ease of operation , your argument seems a bit off.
7.3 manual super dootys are the first unicorn before the 5.9 manual CR Cummins. Great truck.
Op, did good finding one of them.
Nov-28-2017 03:13 PM
Nov-28-2017 01:43 PM
SidecarFlip wrote:
Never been overly fond of the early manuals. The 'Ford has a better idea' hydraulic actuated clutch is a pizzer. It's not adjustable unless you machine an adjustable push rod and even then, the slave will leak down when it gets older and cause clashing gears. Had one of those too. 4 speed with a creeper in a 6.9 Barnyard Buick.
Nov-28-2017 12:36 PM