โApr-05-2016 04:26 PM
โApr-07-2016 05:41 PM
โApr-07-2016 03:07 PM
โApr-07-2016 02:42 PM
goducks10 wrote:Exactly how the OP handled it is not the big thing here. We know that he reported the leak before the TT was in service for one year... Therefore his warranty should be good... There may be some technicalities with transfering it that were not handled correctly... If so, then that is the dealers fault, as a buyer would not know what needs to be done.
I would say all we know is how the OP handled the whole thing. I would like to hear the dealers and Keystones side. Not the way the OP is interpreting it.
Wouldn't deter me from a Keystone product. Every brand has a buyer that's been through the ringer over some issue. If we all decided on what unit to buy based on negative issues then we all would be staying in hotels for vacation.
Keystone sells a bu!! load of RVs. They're bound to have a goof up.
โApr-07-2016 01:29 PM
โApr-07-2016 01:28 PM
goducks10 wrote:
Keystone sells a bu!! load of RVs. They're bound to have a goof up.
โApr-07-2016 11:55 AM
โApr-07-2016 10:16 AM
dodge guy wrote:
...Yes, but now we all know how Keystone handles warranty issues. For this reason alone I would scratch any Keystone product off my list....
โApr-07-2016 09:41 AM
SoundGuy wrote:beemerphile1 wrote:
Those that are offering advice or asking questions, did you miss it when the OP said;
"I'm not here for advise, or to hear opinions on the legitimacy of my claim...."
He doesn't want advice or care about our opinions.
No kidding ... and if I cared enough to bother looking on other forums (I don't) I bet we'd find his same complaint there as well. :R
So if he's not here for "advice" or "hear opinions on the legitimacy of his claim", there's only one remaining reason why he did post here - to seek attention and "right the wrong" that in his mind has been inflicted upon him by Keystone. Ironically, in some twisted way I guess he did get what he wanted as we've already wasted several pages of discussion over this. :S
โApr-07-2016 08:41 AM
beemerphile1 wrote:
Those that are offering advice or asking questions, did you miss it when the OP said;
"I'm not here for advise, or to hear opinions on the legitimacy of my claim...."
He doesn't want advice or care about our opinions.
โApr-07-2016 08:10 AM
beemerphile1 wrote:
Those that are offering advice or asking questions, did you miss it when the OP said;cjelliott81 wrote:
I'm not here for advise, or to hear opinions on the legitimacy of my claim....
He doesn't want advice or care about our opinions.
โApr-07-2016 07:24 AM
cjelliott81 wrote:
I'm not here for advise, or to hear opinions on the legitimacy of my claim....
โApr-07-2016 06:39 AM
B.O. Plenty wrote:goducks10 wrote:Warranty goes to original buyer only. Not transferable. If he bought it used, no matter how old or new it is, it's out of warranty. Why is this such a big deal? Plug the holes, drill 2 new ones and get on with your life...
The OP bought the trailer @8 months old. 4 months left on the transferred warranty. He then after two weeks of ownership took it in for repairs. It never got fixed properly. He's still fighting with Keystone. This seems to me that under normal circumstances if you start a warranty claim before the warranty has expired, and the problem isn't fixed during the warranty period that it should still be a warranty problem. As long as it's documented.
Question is and I'm not sure it's relevant is did the OP file the proper paper work to transfer the warranty? If he's getting it worked on right after purchase then it would seem like he's good to go.
I'm not sure if he's trying to get reimbursed for repairs or just trying to get it fixed.
B.O.
โApr-07-2016 05:59 AM
โApr-07-2016 03:35 AM