โAug-24-2019 11:28 AM
โAug-27-2019 08:29 PM
โAug-27-2019 06:25 PM
โAug-27-2019 04:54 PM
โAug-27-2019 04:45 PM
โAug-27-2019 01:32 PM
โAug-27-2019 09:15 AM
badercubed wrote:Yeah, that may be. I guess it wouldn't be any more susceptible to thrown rocks than your vehicle's windshield. But I must say we like the cover that our Rockwood front window has, as it also turns into a little shade awning when opened.
I assume the front window would basically be windshield glass. That is what our Nano is.
โAug-27-2019 08:47 AM
โAug-27-2019 06:33 AM
Vintage465 wrote:You bring up a good point. While 90% of our camping is off of paved/smooth roads, we do like to get back into some remote dry camping places from time to time. I have experienced taking trailers down wash-boarded forest roads, where things really tend to come apart from the vibration. And concerning all the "bells & whistles," they are nice, but we're probably more on the minimalist side of things usually - less to go wrong and to care for! As a church buddy likes to say, "The more stuff ya got, the more you have to think about!"
My brother bought a Lance 2285 in 2017. I have to say that a Lance has a lot of nice features. Seely mattress. Dimming lights. Fancy covers on the LP tanks. The upholstery has very fine fitting, almost locking together like a puzzle. Really nice day and night shades. The fit and finish is really nice. I do think they are a cut above my ORV when it comes to fit,finish,bells, whistles, details and niceties. But, I don't think they are as durable when it comes to bouncing down a dirt road for miles as Northwood or ORV is. All comes down to what is right for you and if the Lance bells and whistles are what you want to spend you $$$$ on. I like some of the Lance goodies, but I love my ORV.
โAug-26-2019 07:03 PM
โAug-26-2019 05:20 PM
bob213 wrote:I've been all over the Rockwood website and just don't see what we're looking for. Our 2502 utralight was one of the 7.5' wide trailers, which helped keep weight down, but I don't see they are making those anymore (was really a plus for a number of reasons, and we just don't miss that extra 6" of width). The Rockwood Mini seems to be what's taken the place of the true ultralights, but I just don't see the floor plans there we want. Is there really anything much different in the Flagstaff line? (there didn't used to be)
To me, the Rockwood/Flaggstaff lines offer many models and are a lot of trailer for the money. I'm sure in the mini lite or lite models you can find something that fits your price and weight range.
โAug-25-2019 11:06 AM
TeryT wrote:
We've been in our Rockwood 2502 ultralight (3600# dry - see sig) going on 15 years. We've pulled it all over the country and nothing major has failed (thank you Lord!). Admittedly I am quite handy, and have done a good job keeping up after this and that.
Anyway, we've been daydreaming about what we might get if not in this trailer (for whatever reason). So I've looked around a bit and it seems that everything in the size we like (25-27') is at least a couple thousand pounds heavier! This seems to be on account of everything has slides these days . . . We like our smaller, V8 4Runner tow vehicle - it fits in the garage and is also a great vehicle for narrow mountain 4x4 roads.
I did spot something which has an awesome floor plan we really, really like - the Lance 2375. The weight is a bit more, but might be doable with the 4Runner (or other smaller V8). BUT, what I'm seeing of prices on these is quite shocking (e.g., $35k for a used 2018)! This is up there in Arctic Fox or Airstream territory price-wise!
Is the quality or materials that great on a Lance that they can justify a price tag of $50,000+ new!? We paid $16k for our Rockwood 2502 fifteen years ago, and just can't justify that kind of rarefied price for something we currently use no more than 4-6 weeks a year.
Does anybody know of a decent light-weight with that basic floor plan, with a price that won't give us a major coronary?
โAug-25-2019 10:24 AM
โAug-25-2019 10:06 AM
TeryT wrote:Our 208BHS has a two burner stove and no oven, so I'd assume this is the same. The stove works well and I've never used an oven except to store our bread, so that was a plus for us.badercubed wrote:Thanks for sharing that! It is not bad on the weight department at all and is the closest I've seen weight-wise in a 25' to our Rockwood 2502. It looks like it only has one propane tank - is that correct? And also only a two burner stove with no oven, right?
Coachman Apex Nano 213RDS
This is our first year in our Apex Nano, but the build quality is very good and you can't beat their weights for what you get in their floorplans.
โAug-24-2019 08:55 PM
kellem wrote:I've read various posts where people generally agree the Lances are a little better built, but many say that they still don't warrant the much higher price.
In our research it does appear that Lance does practice superior craftsmanship on they're units.
The 2375 is exactly what we're looking at and will likely be the route we take.
Grand Designs has some floorplans we like also as does ORV.
Good luck and keep us posted.