Question on switching to LiFePO4 batteries.

3 tons wrote:
With LFP’s, Wishful thinking can also be fun :)

3 tons

I don't know if this is in reference to my post on what is connected downstream of my switch but I do know for sure what is connected directly to my batteries. When I replaced my off-on switch with an A/B switch there was nothing connected to the battery side of the switch other than the cable from the batteries. I ran another cable along the original cable to allow me to select which battery to use and there were no other junctions.

With LFP’s, Wishful thinking can also be fun :)

3 tons

mbloof wrote:

Sterling1 wrote:
For now I plan to use a volt meter I have installed in my camper for SoC level which should be good enough for my use. I've "calibrated" the camper meter with a multimeter at the batteries when the isolation switch is switched off to eliminate parasitic draw. So far there no significant difference between the camper volt meter and the multimeter but I haven't taken measurements when the batteries are in a low SoC.

Good luck with that. As an example on my NL that switch only breaks the connection to the Converter/charger - the jacks+controller and fridge are directly connected to my battery(s) bypassing that switch.



- Mark0.

On my camper everything gets disconnected from the batteries by the switch other than the generator and inverter which are connected directly to my batteries.

3 tons wrote:
Follow-up to WarrenS65:

When it comes to accurate SOC’s, I kinda see the Bluetooth feature mostly as marketing gimmickry, while their real utility is for checking individual cell status…Further, it remains to be seen how the Bluetooth will respond to two batteries in parallel or series connection…My view is there’s no substitute for the credibility of a Victron shunt based meter..

Of all possible features, the Bluetooth feature wouldn’t be high on my ‘must have’ list - JMO

3 tons

The biggest issue here is different companies use different BMS, and sometimes even the same company will change their BMS if they are not in stock and are running out. Hopefully if this happens the company will list a different model number and let you know if it is compatible with the other BMS they have used. Most are not. It goes the same for mixing different sized batteries or exceeding their limits in series or parallel.

Then you must throw in the fact that some BMS' are better than others. but all of them should be decent at SOC as that's what they base their protection on, so that would never be one of my concerns. a cell drifting out of spec because of partial charging and lack of top balancing would be more concerning to me.

I like my Bluetooth in my camper, do I used it for looking at the capacity remaining, not really, as my phone is pretty must put away when I am in the bush, but I do use the Bluetooth and my phone to look at it once and a while and when I need to change the charging profile. for that it has been a godsend as when I want to do a cell balance, I just switch user profiles in the BMS by Bluetooth, then when it is done balancing, I put it back to the 90% cap. same with the day before I leave for camping, I always take it from the storage voltage to 100% to make sure everything is balanced before I leave. I can do that from my chair in the morning while I am watching the news.

Steve

Sterling1 wrote:
For now I plan to use a volt meter I have installed in my camper for SoC level which should be good enough for my use. I've "calibrated" the camper meter with a multimeter at the batteries when the isolation switch is switched off to eliminate parasitic draw. So far there no significant difference between the camper volt meter and the multimeter but I haven't taken measurements when the batteries are in a low SoC.

Good luck with that. As an example on my NL that switch only breaks the connection to the Converter/charger - the jacks+controller and fridge are directly connected to my battery(s) bypassing that switch.



- Mark0.

3 tons: I agree with you about the accuracy of the BMS vs the SmartShunt and now that everyting is working, that's what I monitor. My shunt would read full for a long time then drop to 20% - 30% very quickly. At the same time, one BMS would show 96% or higher and the other would show around 70%.
Cycling the batteries let everything calibrate. Now the 2 BMSs and shunt all show within a percent or 2.

For now I plan to use a volt meter I have installed in my camper for SoC level which should be good enough for my use. I've "calibrated" the camper meter with a multimeter at the batteries when the isolation switch is switched off to eliminate parasitic draw. So far there no significant difference between the camper volt meter and the multimeter but I haven't taken measurements when the batteries are in a low SoC.

Mark0 said;

“ While the simple solution is to always have more AH then you need/use our truck campers have limited space to stuff more AH in…..”

Absolutely, I couldn’t agree more - two 200a/hr beneath the dinette seats!!


3 tons

3 tons wrote:

3 tons wrote:
Follow-up to WarrenS65:

When it comes to accurate SOC’s, I kinda see the Bluetooth feature mostly as marketing gimmickry, while their real utility is for checking individual cell status…Further, it remains to be seen how the Bluetooth will respond to two batteries in parallel or series connection…My view is there’s no substitute for the credibility of a Victron shunt based meter..

Of all possible features, the Bluetooth feature wouldn’t be high on my ‘must have’ list - JMO

3 tons

Upon edit, the aforementioned Bluetooth SOC inaccuracy may be associated with personal charging practices, and the number of less than a FULL charge, charge cycles which overtime leads to cumulative meter drift, whereas the Victron could be FAR better at resolving cumulative drift…Just MO…

3 tons

IMHO: this is where inline current shunts (Bluetooth or not) come in handy.

Fairly simple - measure AH In/Out of battery(s).

Also IMHO: anything that relies on battery voltage to calculate an implied SOC can't possibly take into account the parasitic loads our campers have in their calculation and therefore will always be an 'approximation meter' at best.

While the simple solution is to always have more AH then you need/use our truck campers have limited space to stuff more AH in. :)



- Mark0.

3 tons wrote:
Follow-up to WarrenS65:

When it comes to accurate SOC’s, I kinda see the Bluetooth feature mostly as marketing gimmickry, while their real utility is for checking individual cell status…Further, it remains to be seen how the Bluetooth will respond to two batteries in parallel or series connection…My view is there’s no substitute for the credibility of a Victron shunt based meter..

Of all possible features, the Bluetooth feature wouldn’t be high on my ‘must have’ list - JMO

3 tons

Upon edit, the aforementioned Bluetooth SOC inaccuracy may be associated with personal charging practices, and the number of less than a FULL charge, charge cycles which overtime leads to cumulative meter drift, whereas the Victron could be FAR better at resolving cumulative drift…Just MO…

3 tons