โJun-30-2017 03:38 PM
โJul-07-2017 03:06 PM
SidecarFlip wrote:The weight thing is very nice.
I can install 2 at the same weight as one conventional battery and with me, I'm very attuned to weight.
โJul-07-2017 02:27 PM
beachbum2011 wrote:
Cabelas Advanced Angler group 27 agm
I watched until they where on sale ordered two free shipping to local store.
They are five years old still hold charge well.
โJul-07-2017 02:13 PM
beachbum2011 wrote:
Cabelas Advanced Angler group 27 agm
I watched until they where on sale ordered two free shipping to local store.
They are five years old still hold charge well.
โJul-07-2017 01:50 PM
โJul-06-2017 06:23 PM
covered wagon wrote:
Sidecar, with a statement like that you just got 20 demerits in my merit book. I had more respect for you bud but now you'll be gathering firewood for the rest of time for all of us.
Trojan Batteries have a very good reputation and are expensive enough to have to be vigilant about taking care of them. Only reason I go cheaper ones is not having to worry about them so much, esp. when they have to stay uncharged due to circumstances while traveling..
โJul-06-2017 06:16 PM
โJul-06-2017 10:30 AM
Eric&Lisa wrote:Kayteg1 wrote:
How is Trojan lately?...
I am on my 2nd Trojan. The first lasted a decade, and it wasn't really bad - I just felt like being proactive due to its age. Longevity attributed to annual watering with distilled water.
No complaints about Trojan. I am a happy customer. Trojan batteries are made for portable industrial equipment that draws a heavy power load. Think the floor cleaners that they run around Home Depot, etc. They are not marketed at RV owners as a primary customer base. There is only one supplier in the area (greater Portland, OR metro), although there are several dealers that buy from them. So they are not the consumer grade batteries you can expect to find at your local Wal-mart/Costco/etc. It takes some looking and calling to find out who has them.
Trojan batteries are worth the extra effort and expense in my opinion.
โJul-06-2017 08:36 AM
Kayteg1 wrote:
How is Trojan lately?...
โJul-05-2017 09:04 AM
SidecarFlip wrote:
My Android gets pretty warm when I'm using power at an accelerated rate. Not sure why the Samsung Galaxy phones went up in flames though. Must have been more than one because Samsung quit producing them.
โJul-05-2017 08:40 AM
โJul-05-2017 07:37 AM
โJul-05-2017 07:32 AM
2oldman wrote:covered wagon wrote:I think the fire risks may be just a bit blown out of proportion. I've heard many stories about lead acid batteries blowing up, but so far nobody is advocating not using them.
Cannot see buying 800 dollar batteries and then spend the same for a good charger to keep from having fire or explosion.
And you don't need an $800 charger.
โJul-05-2017 07:07 AM
covered wagon wrote:
It's weird because there isn't anything on my google search that indicates any differentiation from Lithium Ion to Lithium Iron.
Wikipedia wrote:
The lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery, also called LFP battery (with "LFP" standing for "lithium ferrophosphate"), is a type of rechargeable battery, specifically a lithium-ion battery, which uses LiFePO4 as a cathode material. LiFePO4 batteries have somewhat lower energy density than the more common lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2) design found in consumer electronics, but offer longer lifetimes, better power density (the rate that energy can be drawn from them) and are inherently safer. LiFePO4 is finding a number of roles in vehicle use and backup power.
โJul-04-2017 01:05 PM
covered wagon wrote:I think the fire risks may be just a bit blown out of proportion. I've heard many stories about lead acid batteries blowing up, but so far nobody is advocating not using them.
Cannot see buying 800 dollar batteries and then spend the same for a good charger to keep from having fire or explosion.