Nov-13-2018 01:06 AM
Nov-19-2018 10:10 PM
HMS Beagle wrote:
All RVs should carry a consumer warning sticker on the door which says, "CAUTION: The weights claimed in any of the manufacturer's literature are unreliable, and actual weights are likely to se substantially higher."
This has been true of every RV I have purchased.
Nov-19-2018 09:42 PM
12V Cummins wrote:
Don't the RAM 3500s have a AAM 10.5 rear axle that is rated for a little over 10k rating? Also he said he had the factory rear air suspension which is the exact same suspension you get in a DRW if you order it. So basically same rear suspension as a dually with the air and plenty of axle rating rated by the axle mfg. I'd look for some 19.5s.
Nov-19-2018 09:32 PM
Grit dog wrote:
^ If the camper is actually 5klbs plus, then, ya she's a porker. Can't imagine the camper itself is much heavier than any of the other big 9' slidout campers though. Maybe see of the previous owner filled the cabinets with lead or something. Maybe you can drop a few pounds out of it, or check your weight again.
Otherwise, a new 3500 anything will haul a 4000-4500lb camper easily. It's not really a thing.
Nov-18-2018 07:43 PM
Nov-18-2018 07:30 PM
Nov-18-2018 03:47 AM
d3500ram wrote:A Few years back I looked into this as I was thinking of going the other way , DRW to SRW for beach travel . Never went further as DRW are now allowed on most beaches . Bare in mind this is for '01 - '10 GMC . Other brand and years may differ . A DRW pickup axle is 4" wider than a SRW pickup , the frame width is the same . A DRW cab/chassis has a 4" narrower frame and the same width axle as a SRW . So I would conclude that GM is using the same axle for SRW and a DRW cc except for spring perches . To convert you would also need the front wheel spacers . I have not checked the pn for the bearings but I bet they are the same . The centerline for the load on the bearing whether drw or srw are almost the same. The problem with the bearings with a conversion is now you need extra spacers for the rear for the inner wheel to clear the springs because you have the wide frame and the narrow axle . This configuration will put extra load on the bearings . To do it right you need the longer axle from a drw pickup
Adapters, while an easy change-over to create a pseudo-dually, I have heard opinion that there could be other or different wear factors because the axle tube dimension (track/ width) is longer on the dually where as the SRW has a narrower width.
IIRC it had something to do with axle bearing placement relative to the outer edge: a longer moment is created on the bearings by the fact the force (CL of wheels) is further away when compared to the factory dually axle track.
Any opinion on that? I had thought briefly of doing the conversion on my SRW 3500 until that thesis was presented to me.
Nov-17-2018 07:32 PM
Nov-17-2018 06:00 PM
Nov-15-2018 01:39 PM
d3500ram wrote:12V Cummins wrote:
Don't the RAM 3500s have a AAM 10.5 rear axle that is rated for a little over 10k rating? Also he said he had the factory rear air suspension which is the exact same suspension you get in a DRW if you order it. So basically same rear suspension as a dually with the air and plenty of axle rating rated by the axle mfg. I'd look for some 19.5s.
I know that to be true up though the 3G models, but after that I am not sure since DC (or whatever the parent company is now) is changing around their supposedly "heavy duty" pick-up line.
Nov-15-2018 01:26 PM
12V Cummins wrote:
Don't the RAM 3500s have a AAM 10.5 rear axle that is rated for a little over 10k rating? Also he said he had the factory rear air suspension which is the exact same suspension you get in a DRW if you order it. So basically same rear suspension as a dually with the air and plenty of axle rating rated by the axle mfg. I'd look for some 19.5s.
Nov-15-2018 01:23 PM
Nov-15-2018 11:58 AM
Nov-14-2018 06:23 PM
Nov-14-2018 03:40 PM
valhalla360 wrote:Optimistic Paranoid wrote:
I nevertheless get a bit nervous whenever somebody in a forum offers an opinion that appears to contradict logic and the laws of physics, at least in so far as I think I understand them.
If you are running with rear COG personally, do you have with and without scale readings on your setup?
While having it slightly ahead of the rear axle is better...the laws of physics say it's not really a big deal unless it gets extreme.
Let's take a 4000lb camper on a 16ft wheel base:
- 0.5 ft ahead of the axle: 125lb will be added to the front axle and 3875 will be added to the rear axle.
- 0.5 ft behind the axle: It will remove 125lb from the front axle and add 4125lb to the rear axle.
Taking 125lb off a 3500lb front axle shouldn't impact steering. In fact going from diesel to gas will remove as much or more weight from the front axle.
Adding 250lb to the rear axle is only an issue if it pushes you over the rear axle rating.
By comparison, a 4000lb trailer (no WDH) 4 ft behind the rear axle and 15% tongue weight (600lb)...will take 150lb off the front axle (more than the truck camper). It does only add 750lb to the rear axle.