cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

No shots...not getting in.

garyhaupt
Explorer
Explorer
40 REPLIES 40

bgum
Explorer
Explorer
pennysmom09 wrote:
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.


Itโ€™s not a โ€œpersonal choiceโ€ if you say if you donโ€™t take the shot you cannot go anywhere.


Sure it is you have an either or choice. Having said that I didn't say you can't travel at all I said you couldn't use public transportation. As far as crossing borders their border their rules. Personally I don't think that anyone should be permitted to enter unless they are fully vaccinated. As far as Mexico and Canada open border if fully vaccinated.

bgum
Explorer
Explorer
Terryallan wrote:
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.


So you are saying your vaccination didn't work? That the covid shot is useless? Because if you have had it, and it works. It doesn't matter if someone beside of you has had it or not. IF it works. You are protected. How are they endangering your health?

That you don't believe it works is the very reason most are not getting it. Why get it, if it doesn't work?


The shot is to keep the crud to a manageable level and keep you out of the hospital not to keep you from getting the crud. Be aware the crud serious or not has shown to cause serious health issues including heart and lungs.

JaxDad
Explorer III
Explorer III
PackerBacker wrote:
Please keep the discussion relative to crossing the border for RVing or camping!

Moderators


My apologies to ALL if that was prompted by my comment.

My intention was to point out that it has been proven over & over again that the speed at which people can travel far exceeds the speed at which an infection can manifest itself.

Thus out of an abundance of caution the powers that be have decided it is necessary to slow down the potential spreading by slowing down the travelling.

The latest news on the spreading certainly seems to bear this out.

Boon_Docker
Explorer III
Explorer III
As the moderator said:

PackerBacker wrote:
Please keep the discussion relative to crossing the border for RVing or camping!

Moderators

agesilaus
Explorer III
Explorer III
If you believe the vaccine results the only people at risk would be other unvaccinated people . With vaccines being widely available the vulnerable made the choice to be that way. I see no reason or obligation on my part to do anything to protect them.


Not quite true, vaccines are not 100.000% effective. The numbers for current vaccines range from 98% down to 67% for the Russian and Chinese vaccines. Even at 98% that means for a million people vaccinated 2% of them did not acquire immunity, that is 20,000 per million or for 100 million vaccinated 2 million are not immune.
That is why all this flap about people getting the plague after getting the shots is just silly.
Arctic Fox 25Y Travel Trailer
2018 RAM 2500 6.7L 4WD shortbed
Straightline dual cam hitch
400W Solar with Victron controller
Superbumper

wapiticountry
Explorer
Explorer
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.
If you believe the vaccine results the only people at risk would be other unvaccinated people . With vaccines being widely available the vulnerable made the choice to be that way. I see no reason or obligation on my part to do anything to protect them.

agesilaus
Explorer III
Explorer III
PackerBacker wrote:
Please keep the discussion relative to crossing the border for RVing or camping!

Moderators


Right back to the subject: Their country, their rules. Don't like it, stay home. I was interested to see that this month's Escapade has three "Going to Alaska' seminars planned.
Arctic Fox 25Y Travel Trailer
2018 RAM 2500 6.7L 4WD shortbed
Straightline dual cam hitch
400W Solar with Victron controller
Superbumper

Community Alumni
Not applicable
Please keep the discussion relative to crossing the border for RVing or camping!

Moderators

JaxDad
Explorer III
Explorer III
Terryallan wrote:
time2roll wrote:
Terryallan wrote:
Honestly. Shouldn't it be a personal choice?
It is. Best of luck to them without the vaccine.


Agree to a point. But since they lived thru the worst part, and didn't get it. There is a better than good chance they won't and in truth it is 99 percent survivable for most people.
Then there is the ones that did have it and now have immunity because of it. They don't need the vaccine. Or so the doctors say.


Some of the variants are making the original virus look like hay-fever.

It is hop-scotching over double vaccinated folks and previously infected (and recovered) folks like itโ€™s a completely different bug.

agesilaus
Explorer III
Explorer III
Terryallan wrote:
Honestly. Shouldn't it be a personal choice? We have had ours. But we weren't forced. Isn't that what freedom is all about. After all, if you are vaccinated, you are safe. Well if it works. So by trying to force others to be vaccinated. Aren't you really saying you don't trust your vaccination?
And if you don't think your vaccination worked, why would you think someone else's did? Them being vaccinated makes you no safer. So why worry about their choice?


I'm not for forcing folks to be vaccinated, especially since herd immunity seems to have been achieved. On the other hand I agree with the policy of no vaccination no school, or if employers demands the jab then no jab no job.
As Eisenhower may have said, the public (he said army) is like a mass of cooked spaghetti, you can't get behind and push you have to get in front an pull. Door to door gestapo inspections aren't pulling.

The idea that your neighbor needs to get the jab to protect you is wrong, if you are worried get the jab yourself and be protected. It doesn't matter what others do. The same hogwash was h tried over forcing people to wear masks.
Arctic Fox 25Y Travel Trailer
2018 RAM 2500 6.7L 4WD shortbed
Straightline dual cam hitch
400W Solar with Victron controller
Superbumper

Terryallan
Explorer II
Explorer II
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.


So you are saying your vaccination didn't work? That the covid shot is useless? Because if you have had it, and it works. It doesn't matter if someone beside of you has had it or not. IF it works. You are protected. How are they endangering your health?

That you don't believe it works is the very reason most are not getting it. Why get it, if it doesn't work?
Terry & Shay
Coachman Apex 288BH.
2013 F150 XLT Off Road
5.0, 3.73
Lazy Campers

pennysmom09
Explorer
Explorer
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.


Itโ€™s not a โ€œpersonal choiceโ€ if you say if you donโ€™t take the shot you cannot go anywhere.
Nancy and Doug
2015 KZ Durango 325RL FW

Lwiddis
Explorer II
Explorer II
X2, bgum.
Winnebago 2101DS TT & 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71, WindyNation 300 watt solar-Lossigy 200 AH Lithium battery. Prefer boondocking, USFS, COE, BLM, NPS, TVA, state camps. Bicyclist. 14 yr. Army -11B40 then 11A - (MOS 1542 & 1560) IOBC & IOAC grad

bgum
Explorer
Explorer
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.