โFeb-26-2006 11:21 AM
โJun-29-2010 08:38 AM
โJun-27-2010 08:04 AM
โJun-24-2010 10:28 AM
โJun-23-2010 02:39 PM
โJun-23-2010 02:31 PM
โJun-23-2010 02:27 PM
โJun-23-2010 11:29 AM
โJun-21-2010 06:05 PM
Bukhrn wrote:I actually responded to this msg., but have no clue where it went. lol. I apologzie if this shows twice.
We're not into tear drops,(a little claustrophobic) but I love that screen room, did it come with the TD?
โJun-21-2010 02:39 PM
dmatt wrote:newk wrote:bakerkids wrote:
...
(I think my pics are too large, but I thought I'd read to put 640 in one box for size, which I did. Feel free, mod, to downsize)
Your pix aren't too big, or at least not by much. But I wanted to respond to the "put 640 in one box for size" idea. All that affects is the size that's displayed on the screen. It does NOT reduce the file size for loading speed and it's absolutely the wrong way to control the size of your pictures for net use.
That's what the Mods say to do here on this site.
โJun-21-2010 12:53 PM
coastie_family wrote:
We were at Palo Duro Canyon State Park the same day as we had the storm and same rainbow. We didn't camp there, just spent the day there. Very beautiful park! We just got back today!
โJun-21-2010 12:25 PM
โJun-21-2010 11:02 AM
newk wrote:bakerkids wrote:
...
(I think my pics are too large, but I thought I'd read to put 640 in one box for size, which I did. Feel free, mod, to downsize)
Your pix aren't too big, or at least not by much. But I wanted to respond to the "put 640 in one box for size" idea. All that affects is the size that's displayed on the screen. It does NOT reduce the file size for loading speed and it's absolutely the wrong way to control the size of your pictures for net use.
โJun-21-2010 10:54 AM
bakerkids wrote:
...
(I think my pics are too large, but I thought I'd read to put 640 in one box for size, which I did. Feel free, mod, to downsize)
โJun-21-2010 07:50 AM
Howdy fellow T@Ber!!!
โJun-21-2010 06:52 AM
bakerkids wrote:
Lieber Rec. Area and Cataract Falls, Cloverdale, IN