โFeb-26-2006 11:21 AM
โJan-17-2011 11:27 AM
โJan-17-2011 11:08 AM
โJan-17-2011 10:54 AM
โJan-16-2011 08:39 PM
โJan-16-2011 06:35 PM
โJan-16-2011 11:49 AM
โJan-16-2011 11:40 AM
bukhrn wrote:drenjoey wrote:Maybe, but not always useful, as even on rvpark reviews, some people rate a place very low because it didn't have free WIFI available, or they couldn't get TV reception without a satellite, when in fact, neither of those are why "Most" people go camping/RVingclkelley564 wrote:Pirate wrote:
Thank you. I don't need to see a dozen pictures of someones trailer at the same campground.
I thought the idea was to give folks an idea what a particular "campsite" was like at various campgrounds. So pictures from different angles and all directions gives folks the best idea of what the actual site is like.
A closeup of the camper that doesn't show how the campsite is in relation to the road and other sites is not helpful.
It is most definitely necessary to list the campground name, state, city, and SITE #. Also listing what the site has, (water, electric, sewer, etc.) and proximity to facilities helps a bunch.
Would it hurt to also state how much a person paid for the campsite?
I do agree with the above, and I think 2 pictures of a site will give everyone an idea of what it looks like.
Chickadee just posted 2 pictures of a site and that's exactly what the topic is about.
Here's a thought: Do you guys think adding a personal rating (let's say from 1 to 5) of the campground in general is a good idea?
Dre
โJan-12-2011 12:10 PM
โJan-01-2011 09:23 AM
โDec-29-2010 09:08 AM
โDec-29-2010 05:58 AM
โDec-29-2010 02:33 AM
โDec-20-2010 06:34 PM
โDec-20-2010 06:23 PM
โDec-20-2010 06:20 PM