~Post your campsite photos here~

[answerswillvary]

Lately there has been a lot of interest in viewing photos of the sites that different campgrounds have to offer. Let's start posting them to this thread and if there seems to be enough interest, perhaps we can make the thread a permanent sticky.

If you have recently posted photos of this sort, please re-post them here. If you have new ones to share, please do!

Don't forget to label the photos: Campground name, site #'s if you know them, area of campground, etc.

Picture Posting Help

**A photo width of 500 works really well.

I am taking the liberty of copying here some recent photos submitted by member 'marites62'.

Fishing Bridge - This is site 60 in the B loop - back-in, full hookups (It can be tough for long trailers and 5th wheels):


More of the same site:






Colter Bay Village - This is site 40, Pull through, full hookups. It is at the end of the loop which was nice.


More of the same site:










Thanks,
Sandi (Moderator)

[Jetstreamer]

Wisconsin Pattison State park #46

[Jetstreamer]

Wisconsin Interstate State park #31

[bukhrn]

tomb48 wrote:
Chewonki Campground - Wiscassett, ME - July 2010
Site:NN(Nakita's Nook), water,sewer & electric,adjacent to saltwater pool,showers located at pool entrance. Small private airport very close by, props only, land & take off over campground during the day only, really not a bother. Campground in Booth Bay Harbor area, Mid-coast Maine,lots to do & see.

Salt water pool directly behind site.


Beautiful view of the river & basin at high tide.

Hard to believe that this a Campground, not another camper in sight, beautiful !!!!

[garmp]

These are a couple of years old, but still like them. Hawn State Park, about 60 miles south of St Louis
off Hwy 32 near Ste. Genevieve.
Hit the park in mid May when the dogwoods were in bloom. Lovely!!!

[tomb48]

Chewonki Campground - Wiscassett, ME - July 2010
Site:NN(Nakita's Nook), water,sewer & electric,adjacent to saltwater pool,showers located at pool entrance. Small private airport very close by, props only, land & take off over campground during the day only, really not a bother. Campground in Booth Bay Harbor area, Mid-coast Maine,lots to do & see.

Salt water pool directly behind site.


Beautiful view of the river & basin at high tide.

[Okie_in_Wyoming]

Mike and Paula wrote:

ReneeG wrote:

Mike and Paula wrote:
Fort Wilderness WDW May 2010
600 loop

Really nice looking Class C Mike and Paula.

Thanks ReneeG. It still looks good for 27yrs old

It certainly does! A real beauty!
Okie

[Mike_and_Paula]

ReneeG wrote:

Mike and Paula wrote:
Fort Wilderness WDW May 2010
600 loop

Really nice looking Class C Mike and Paula.

Thanks ReneeG. It still looks good for 27yrs old

[goreds2]

GoneCamping wrote:
This is Site #7 Loop-C at Goose Point Park (Army COE) near Martinsville Va...

This is from page 1 of this thread but what an awesome campsite.

[ReneeG]

I find it helpful to see "their" RV in a campsite. Seeing it allows me to compare the length of their's with mine to determine if the campsite is suitable.

[2gypsies1]

I totally agree that two pictures of the campsite should be the maximum. Some folks seem to post pictures of "their RV" rather the campsite or of the surrounding area - not even the campground. I don't care to look at their RV or camp unit from 12 different angles or of people doing odd things such as walking up the steps. Let's keep it simple and to the point and to be helpful in choosing campsites.

[bukhrn]

drenjoey wrote:

clkelley564 wrote:

Pirate wrote:
Thank you. I don't need to see a dozen pictures of someones trailer at the same campground.

I thought the idea was to give folks an idea what a particular "campsite" was like at various campgrounds. So pictures from different angles and all directions gives folks the best idea of what the actual site is like.

A closeup of the camper that doesn't show how the campsite is in relation to the road and other sites is not helpful.

It is most definitely necessary to list the campground name, state, city, and SITE #. Also listing what the site has, (water, electric, sewer, etc.) and proximity to facilities helps a bunch.

I do agree with the above, and I think 2 pictures of a site will give everyone an idea of what it looks like.
Chickadee just posted 2 pictures of a site and that's exactly what the topic is about.
Here's a thought: Do you guys think adding a personal rating (let's say from 1 to 5) of the campground in general is a good idea?

Dre

Maybe, but not always useful, as even on rvpark reviews, some people rate a place very low because it didn't have free WIFI available, or they couldn't get TV reception without a satellite, when in fact, neither of those are why "Most" people go camping/RVing

[Sing4Mi]

drenjoey wrote:

clkelley564 wrote:

Pirate wrote:
Thank you. I don't need to see a dozen pictures of someones trailer at the same campground.

I thought the idea was to give folks an idea what a particular "campsite" was like at various campgrounds. So pictures from different angles and all directions gives folks the best idea of what the actual site is like.

A closeup of the camper that doesn't show how the campsite is in relation to the road and other sites is not helpful.

It is most definitely necessary to list the campground name, state, city, and SITE #. Also listing what the site has, (water, electric, sewer, etc.) and proximity to facilities helps a bunch.

I do agree with the above, and I think 2 pictures of a site will give everyone an idea of what it looks like.
Chickadee just posted 2 pictures of a site and that's exactly what the topic is about.
Here's a thought: Do you guys think adding a personal rating (let's say from 1 to 5) of the campground in general is a good idea?

Dre

Me too. I think ratings is a good idea but I don't see a way it will work.

[drenjoey]

clkelley564 wrote:

Pirate wrote:
Thank you. I don't need to see a dozen pictures of someones trailer at the same campground.

I thought the idea was to give folks an idea what a particular "campsite" was like at various campgrounds. So pictures from different angles and all directions gives folks the best idea of what the actual site is like.

A closeup of the camper that doesn't show how the campsite is in relation to the road and other sites is not helpful.

It is most definitely necessary to list the campground name, state, city, and SITE #. Also listing what the site has, (water, electric, sewer, etc.) and proximity to facilities helps a bunch.

I do agree with the above, and I think 2 pictures of a site will give everyone an idea of what it looks like.
Chickadee just posted 2 pictures of a site and that's exactly what the topic is about.
Here's a thought: Do you guys think adding a personal rating (let's say from 1 to 5) of the campground in general is a good idea?

Dre

[ReneeG]

Mike and Paula wrote:
Fort Wilderness WDW May 2010
600 loop

Really nice looking Class C Mike and Paula.

[chickadee]

Thanksgiving week end

Willow Tree Rv Resort
Long, SC 15 mins from the beach.

Site #43 (huge sites)