Lantley wrote:
I stayed in Ontario this past summer at a CG that did not take my CC or give me a written confirmation.
Before I drove to Canada on a "I told you so" I requested the CG send me an E mail confirmation of my reservation.
While it was a very informal E mail the CG did give it to me in writing.
I arrived and everything was fine.
This CG had a very loose reservation policy where I could see the potential for problems like you encountered. On a local trip or somewhere that I know I have other options I might wing it. But on longer trips especially in remote areas where my options are limited. I try to have my reservations in writing.
In the end I guess it doesn't matter if I had written confirmation or not,if the CG did not save me a spot or honor my reservation I would still be SOL.
I suddenly feel you pain,aggravation and frustration!
Lantley,
THANK YOU for getting it...your last line brought you to my pain...
I THOUGHT I had followed the CG's reservation policy...only to find out they really didn't have a reservation policy if you will but operates more on a first come/first served basis...which is COOL...but TELL THE PEOPLE THAT when you "take" their reservation.
The issue for me was that they let the current group EXTEND...probably because there were 10 of them and they only had ME coming in...so hosing me out of my ONE site to keep TEN existing campers to get another nights site rent felt RIGHT to the owner...
My point I was trying to get across in my post on RVParkReviews...was simply that...reservations mean NOTHING to this particular park and I wanted to WARN potential campers of the danger.
Was my situation a specific one?...well we'll never know because admin over at RVParkReviews and apparently a member I have now blocked here doesn't let those types of "trends" be formed.
I'll tell you this though...if a park does it ONCE to someone that has the stones to write about it...I'll bet you there are at least 1 or 2 or 10 more times it has happened and people just don't take the time to report it...or they did and admin over there felt it was "too personal" of a situation...who knows.
All I know is I showed up in a pretty limited CG area believing I had a site only to be turned away...sure they "offered" a site that was totally unacceptable for a 40' MH...and the MGR knew it...
And as soon as I pulled in with my rig and the "manager" saw it and he said "let me show you what I have and YOU DECIDE"...I knew he knew I would not like the site...why else would he phrase it that way?
For the existing campers...why didn't he move one of them there like MOST CG's would do?...well there were 10 of them and they were paying...there was only one of me showing up...simple economics...I get it...but is that a way to treat ANY of your business customers???...i.e. TRENDS...and CENSORED...
Is there good at RVParkReviews...well...I had thought so and I too could "weed through" the rants and glowings to find the "average" camper experience...however now I'm not so sure there is real value in what is "allowed" to be posted over there...why does admin feel that the average camper cannot "weed through" ALL the information and formulate our OWN opinion versus a censored one?
How many reviews about a SPECIFIC park are "censored" and if allowed to be posted would have shown a TREND over a year or so?...do you really think admin over there can keep track of those trends he is blocking on a SPECIFIC CG?...
Joe.
2007 Tiffin Phaeton 40 QSH 350Cat (3 women and 4 slides...Just RIGHT! :B)
2012 Jeep Liberty Sport (toad)
2005 Ford Excursion V10 w/4.30's (Sold)